JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
+1EV
Leggere modifiche in PP più crop..!!!
Come posso migliorare questo tipo di scatti??
What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 01, 2012 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
is always fascinating to photograph the moon .. I see enough noise across the moon, then I have a question .. why f22? a f8/11 than enough and went forward .. so you lose sharpness because of difrazzione. è sempre affascinante fotografare la luna.. vedo abbastanza rumore su tutta la luna, poi avrei una domanda.. come mai f22? un f8/11 al massimo bastava e avanzava..così perdi nitidezza a causa della difrazzione.
sent on June 01, 2012 (17:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Most just question =) I'm wrong .. I closed the shutter too because I wanted to capture all the details .. cmq is true .. a F8/11 was enough ..! cmq it is full of noise. and yet it is strange because I used a low ISO 200! noise usually notice it after the 800 .. ke I will not be created in post production to emphasize too many details!! Domanda giustissima =) ho sbagliato.. ho chiuso troppo l'otturatore perchè volevo catturare tutti i dettagli.. cmq è vero.. un F8/11 poteva bastare..!! cmq si è piena di rumore. e pure è strano perchè ho usato un iso basso 200!! di solito il rumore lo noto dopo gli 800.. non sarà ke l'ho creato in post produzione per enfatizzare troppi i dettagli?!?!
sent on June 01, 2012 (18:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ ke I will not be created in post production to emphasize too many details!! „
I think so ... :-D You need to review a bit the PP, but this is a consequence dell'f22, if I used 8/11 would not have needed to "add" sharpness in post .. or at least not so much .. " non sarà ke l'ho creato in post produzione per enfatizzare troppi i dettagli?!?!" Credo proprio di si... devi rivedere un po la PP, ma anche questa è una conseguenza dell'f22, se avessi usato 8/11 non avresti avuto bisogno di "aggiungere" nitidezza in post..o almeno non cosi tanta..
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
devi rivedere un po la PP, ma anche questa è una conseguenza dell'f22, se avessi usato 8/11 non avresti avuto bisogno di "aggiungere" nitidezza in post..o almeno non cosi tanta..