Diffraction | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

$Diffraction...$

19.6 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (3 photos)

Diffraction sent on December 02, 2015 (11:04) by Mattiaradoni. 6 comments, 283 views.

, 1/50 f/8.0, ISO 400, hand held.

Spesso il fare è un fenomeno non voluto nelle foto, ma a volte può regalare qualcosa di particolare!

View High Resolution 19.6 MP

4 persons like it: Guz, Mao72, Max Chiodini, Riccardogibilterra

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Riccardogibilterra

sent on December 02, 2015 (11:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

FABULOUS! Beautiful colors!

Mattiaradoni

sent on December 02, 2015 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks a lot :-)

Guz	sent on December 02, 2015 (12:41) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Original shooting at f8 on canon but I doubt this can be defined 6d diffraction. It is a ghost flare due to the direct backlight. good boy

Mattiaradoni

sent on December 02, 2015 (12:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A flare should be caused by the lens right? Why this "breakdown" of the light I saw with the naked eye

Guz

sent on December 02, 2015 (12:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It is a flare from the lens and accentuated by the absence or presence of an anti-reflection coating and the quantity of backlight and the direction / angle of the same. the diffraction is caused by the passage of light inside a hole (aperture) more 'or less large. more 'closed is the diaphragm the greater the diffraction or the general qualitative decay (in terms of quality of sharpness). f8 is not the classic diaphragm from above diffraction for the 100 macro. the image is veiled by backlighting and not decay due to diffraction. I said this is a pleasant image

Mattiaradoni

sent on December 02, 2015 (13:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok thank you for the clarification and to the appreciation of the picture :-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.