2228 | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Still Life

Resize to fit window

Foto 1 View gallery (21 photos)

2228 sent on November 21, 2015 (21:14) by Mtj. 4 comments, 797 views.

, 1/400 f/2.0, ISO 200, hand held.

1 person like it: Flaber70

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Luchino

sent on December 16, 2015 (22:42)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Sicuro che è stata fatta a f2???
Saluti
Luca

Sure it was made to f2 ???
Greetings
Luca

Mtj

sent on December 21, 2015 (16:38)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

" Sicuro che è stata fatta a f2???"
Sì.
Saluti
Max

“ Sure that was made at f2 ??? „

Yup.
Greetings
Max

Benjo255

sent on December 24, 2015 (10:22)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Accidenti...anche a me sembra un po' troppo a fuoco per essere stata fatta a F/2. Il punto di MAF è sicuramente il secondo palo, procedendo dall'osservatore verso l'orizzone...però anche a me sembra che sia un po' poco lo sfocato...

Damn ... even to me it seems a bit 'too much focus was to be made to F / 2. The point of MAF is certainly the far post, proceeding from the observer to the orizzone ... but to me it seems to be a little 'the little fuzzy ...

Mtj

sent on December 24, 2015 (11:36)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Sì il punto di maf è sul secondo palo ma tenete conto che è un 35mm non un tele, e su sensore apsc la pdc è un pelo più estesa che non su FF :) Ergo, non c'è uno stacco esorbitante con sfocato etereo come ci sarebbe stato con un tele a f2 su FF. Col 35 per staccare tanto lo sfondo devo mettere a fuoco a mezzo metro da me e allora la pdc è ridottissima :-P

Yes the point maf is at the far post but keep in mind that it is a not a 35mm canvas, and on the pdc APSC sensor is a bit more extensive than on FF :) Ergo, there is a break with exorbitant blurred ethereal as there would be a canvas to f2 on FF. With 35 to remove the background so I have to focus at half a meter from me and then the pdc is very low :-P

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.