JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 23, 2012 (11:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent sharpness David, perhaps the incident light on the subject is invasive (flash?) Unfortunately this forum is not a swallowtail so you know ... Here are all familiar with the Belen (you spell that?):-D ottima nitidezza Davide, forse la luce incidente sul soggetto è invasiva( flash ?) Purtroppo per questo forum non è un macaone per cui sai com'è... qui sono tutti abituati con la Belen( si scrive cosi?)
sent on May 23, 2012 (13:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and Leonardo comment. The light was just a bit 'hard because taken in the late afternoon. It is, in fact, I noticed that not widely locusts. I thought it was due to some flaw my camera. I like how the other animals and even be able to enhance the beauty of nature with a person who is barely noticeable to the naked eye, I think the most rewarding and interesting. Grazie del passaggio e commento Leonardo. La luce era proprio un po' dura perchè scattata nel tardo pomeriggio. Si in effetti ho notato che non riscuotono molto successo le cavallette. Pensavo fosse dovuto a qualche mia pecca fotografica. A me piacciono come gli altri animali ed anzi riuscire ad esaltare la bellezza della natura con un soggetto che si nota appena ad occhio nudo, penso sia la cosa più gratificante ed interessante.
sent on May 23, 2012 (17:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I can not tell what David has been successful. the dynamics can be many. sometimes not even a good picture is seen (just guradare the number of visitors) and it seems that your comments are rather abused on subjects as I see it and I probably will feel like they will have the Maronites beautiful shredded to be photographed:-D many of which are misinterpreted and biologically inconsistent to say absolutely manipulated. Your photo has at least the gift of spontaneity.
One question: How much did you have to crop it to fill the frame using only 300. I do not see the presence of the tubes in the data Non saprei dirti Davide cosa riscuote successo. le dinamiche possono essere tante. a volte una buona foto manco viene vista(basta guradare il numero dei visitatori) e sembra che i commenti siano invece abusati su soggetti che per come la vedo io e probabilmente per come si sentiranno loro avranno i maroni belli triturati di farsi fotografare molti dei quali son erroneamente interpretati e biologicamente inconsistenti per non dire assolutamente manipolati. La tua foto ha quantomeno il dono della spontaneità.
Una domanda: Quanto hai dovuto croppare per riempire così il fotogramma usando il solo 300. Non vedo presenza dei tubi nei dati
sent on May 24, 2012 (8:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with your ideas I used the 300 mm with 56 mm extension, the picture is still a bit 'cropped. Condivido le tue idee Ho usato il 300 mm con 56 mm di prolunga, la foto è comunque un po' croppata.