What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 12, 2012 (23:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the colors, the composition, the three-dimensionality and sharpness. Pleasant sense of calm transmitted. Did you use the lens hood? You have evaluated the use of a polarizing filter slim? hello and good life, laurel Mi piacciono le cromie, la composizione, la tridimensionalità e la nitidezza. Piacevole il senso di quiete trasmessa. Hai utilizzato il paraluce? Hai valutato l'uso di un filtro polarizzatore slim ? ciao e buona vita, lauro |
| sent on June 13, 2012 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Lauro, so I always use the lens hood, is to protect the lens and reflex indesiderati.IL circular polarizer I would not is less invasive than the slim? A curiosity I know why everyone has with the canon 17-85? hello Grazie Lauro,sì io uso sempre il paraluce,sia per proteggere l'obiettivo sia per riflessi indesiderati.IL polarizzatore lo vorrei circolare non è meno invasivo dello slim ? Una curiosità mi sai spiegare perché tutti ce l'hanno con il 17-85 canon? ciao |
| sent on June 13, 2012 (22:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Means for slim with a thickness of the thin ring very valuable if you do not want to add dellavignettatura mecacnica. For example, if you wanted to apply a canon 17-40mm f.4 l usm canon 500d sulkla your problem does not arise because the lens is born to acting and is not involved in the most extreme.
The canon 17-85mm lens seems like a good all-in-one, has only a very strong barrel distortion 17mm (5%), which becomes gradually less up to 30-35mm.
For landscape photos is not to be the best that could create problems for forcing us to resort to pp
The canon 17-40mm, for example, if mounted on aps-c has only 2% distortion at 17-19mm ;-)
hello, laurel
Per slim si intende con uno spessore del ring sottile molto prezioso se non vogliamo aggiungere dellavignettatura mecacnica . Se per esempio tu volessi applicare un canon 17-40mm f.4 l usm sulkla tua canon 500d il problema non si porrebbe perchè l'ottica è nata per f.f. e non viene coinvolta la parte più estrema.
Il canon 17-85mm mi sembra una buona ottica all-in-one , ha solo una fortissima distorsione a barile 17mm (5%) che diventa via via inferiore fino a 30-35mm .
Per foto paesaggistiche non è che sia il massimo per i problemi che potrebbe creare costringendoci a ricorre alla p.p.
Il canon 17-40mm ,ad esempio, se montato su aps-c ha solo il 2% di distorsione a 17-19mm 
ciao, lauro
|
| sent on February 22, 2016 (14:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful colors and natural good!
Angel Colori bellissimi e naturali bravo!
Angelo |
| sent on February 22, 2016 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Angelo. Grazie Angelo. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
