RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » melanargia galathea

 
melanargia galathea...

Flora

View gallery (11 photos)

melanargia galathea sent on October 22, 2015 (13:14) by Manuel Giallo. 4 comments, 1123 views. [retina]

, 1/500 f/8.0, ISO 200, hand held. Parco Nazionale Val Grande, Italy.




View High Resolution 6.0 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on October 22, 2015 (14:25)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


L'identificazione non è corretta, trattasi di Aporia crataegi detta anche Pieride del biancospino.
Non è il massimo della nitidezza però va considerato il mano libera.
Nel caso dell'ala in secondo piano sembra venga a mancare della pdc perchè mi sembra questa sia leggermente divaricata, naturalmente occorrerebbe sapere di quanto per constatare se chiudendo maggiormente avresti raggiunto tale possibilità.
Nel caso dell'ala in primo piano sarebbe stato utile un miglior parallelismo.


The identification is incorrect, question Aporia crataegi also called veined White.
Not great sharpness but it must consider the free hand.
In the case of the wing in the background seems to be missing the pdc because I think this is slightly splayed, of course should know what to see if you would have achieved by closing more this possibility.
In the case of the wing in the foreground would be helpful better parallelism.

avatarsenior
sent on October 22, 2015 (14:35)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Quoto sopra...

Quoto above ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 22, 2015 (20:09)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Anche io sono dell'idea di Pigi. Comunque bella farfalla e fiore.

I also have the idea of ??Pigi. However beautiful butterfly and flower.

avatarjunior
sent on October 23, 2015 (10:55)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie mille, correggo il titolo e aggiungo un tassello alla conoscenza sulle farfalle.
Si, con il treppiede sarebbe decisamente meglio ma mi trovo spesso a fotografare mentre sono impegnato in altre attività che richiedono il trasporto di materiale ingombrante, escludendo perciò la possibilità di avere con me il treppiede.
Vorrei chiedervi, ma quindi se l'ala in secondo piano fosse stata troppo distante sarebbe comparsa comunque non completamente a fuoco anche se avessi chiuso di più il diaframma?



Thank you so much, I correct the title and add an element to the knowledge about butterflies.
Yes, the tripod would be a lot better but I often take pictures while they are engaged in other activities that require the transport of bulky material, thus excluding the possibility of having a tripod with me.
I would ask, but then if the wing in the second floor had been too far away would appear still not completely in focus even if I had closed most of the diaphragm?



RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me