What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 07, 2015 (12:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my ignorance, I always thought that's Cassiopeia there was very little interesting and flashy ... I recently discovered that it is not so, especially in the winter sky. Beautiful M52 Elio ;-) Nella mia ignoranza, ho sempre pensato che in zona Cassiopea ci fosse ben poco di interessante e vistoso... recentemente ho scoperto che non è affatto così, soprattutto nel cielo invernale. Bella M52 Elio |
| sent on October 07, 2015 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beppe this cluster is prospectively very close to the most famous nebula Bubble, here are the boundaries between Cassiopeia and Cepheus. Beppe questo ammasso è prospetticamente vicinissimo alla più famosa nebulosa Bolla, qui siamo tra i confini di Cassiopea e Cefeo. |
| sent on October 07, 2015 (18:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I always snubbed this area, being interested mainly for the area Sagittarius ... to the large field at the most I can use 100mm are few, as I did for IC 1805 and IC 1848, and the Double Cluster of Perseus but unfortunately the number of 14 frames of 8 minutes unguided I made were moved, possibly to the collapse of the tripod into the ground to gravel ... For the IC 1396 and NGC 7635 I'd need at least 200mm at the time I did not, although I might add a 2x to 100mm but I do not trust ... I will see later if finances permit me, to add a 200mm and a EQ6 equatorial type, my Ioptron Sky Tracker has structural limitations. Ho sempre snobbato questa zona, interessandomi prevalentemente per la zona Sagittario... per il largo campo al massimo posso usare 100mm che sono pochini, così come ho fatto per IC 1805 e IC 1848 e il doppio ammasso del Perseo ma purtroppo la serie dei 14 frames da 8 minuti non guidati che ho fatto sono risultati mossi, forse per il cedimento del treppiede nel terreno di ghiaia... Per la IC 1396 e NGC 7635 mi ci vorrebbe almeno 200mm che al momento non ho, sebbene potrei aggiungere un 2x al 100mm ma non mi fido...vedrò più avanti se le finanze me lo permetteranno, di aggiungere un 200mm e una equatoriale tipo EQ6, il mio Ioptron Sky Tracker ha delle limitazioni strutturali. |
| sent on October 07, 2015 (19:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful this photo Elio? It reminds me of the nights in the mountains to make observation with 20x Miyauchi 100 who had a friend :-) show bella questa foto Elio? mi ricorda le notti di montagna a fare osservazione con il Miyauchi 20x 100 che aveva un amico spettacolo |
| sent on October 07, 2015 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, good, hello Molto bella, bravo, ciao |
| sent on October 08, 2015 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Guys, I Beppe last week I took the AstroTrac, if I find the time and the good weather in the coming months will put to the test. Grazie Ragazzi, Beppe io la settimana scorsa ho preso l'Astrotrac, se trovo il tempo e il bel tempo nei prossimi mesi lo metterò alla prova. |
| sent on October 09, 2015 (1:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You should have no problems Elio, if not this damn weather, I have to redo IC 1805 and IC 1848: -D Non dovresti avere problemi Elio, se non con questo dannato meteo, io devo rifare IC 1805 e IC 1848 |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |