RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Hawk

 
Hawk...

Animali

View gallery (2 photos)

Hawk sent on September 10, 2015 (17:03) by Newborn Awakening. 7 comments, 879 views.

at 200mm, 1/320 f/2.8, ISO 500, hand held.




3 persons like it: Palmieri Raimondo, Paolo P, Vale Gira


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on September 10, 2015 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In this photo there 'even need to declare that and' was made in captivity '. Sara 'that I disliked the falconers as provided to hunters who do not even want to comment on it, hello and sorry

avatarjunior
sent on September 10, 2015 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well ... so sorry I made perhaps a crime ?! What kind of comments are these? Excuse the next time instead of "captive animals or poachers section" ... rather not comment just my photos, thanks.

avatarsenior
sent on September 10, 2015 (18:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Francis is not the case to be angry
if you will not be commented not put photos in comment area there are people suffering in seeing a hawk forced to have the Getae the legs, forced to fly for only 5 minutes a day, only to be locked up in a cage with his eyes covered for the remaining 23hrs and 55 minutes
back to photo 1/320 f / 2.8, ISO 500, freehand. I do not seem right to me just I closed the diaphragm at least in f9

avatarjunior
sent on September 10, 2015 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Such a pity!!! :-(

avatarjunior
sent on September 10, 2015 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Maurice, I want to be commented and accept any criticism that I get moved, they are not sterile opinions though. Read "comments no comments" with all considerations of personal (sometimes obvious) I think it is an unnecessary and unconstructive. Among other interventions senseless as this, cit. "I will not even comment on it" ... what's the point ?! do not you order the doctor, do not mean you have to write something ...
And 'as if the sight of a photo of a child in Darfur, sick and malnourished, I go out with a comment like: "it is clear that it is a poor African child. It will be unpleasant to me are the people who promote hatred and war in these places that do not even want to comment. "
I can understand the pain that you can try for certain injustices, but & egrave; the sad reality ... sorry for the outburst.

avatarmoderator
sent on September 10, 2015 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Newborn; I think you are "occasional passer" in this section and you wonder why the comments (not offensive to you) by Marco.
The falconry is much debated question, just look a little bit here in the forum; However this is a comment section ..
The regulation does not prohibit post captive animals but must be declared in the caption; in this case it is clear that you did not want to hide anything.
The beauty of the subject is not in doubt and also the picture in this respect seems to me nice; the comments of the photo can also relate to the emotion it elicits; if someone wants to say that the picture causes him discomfort, the polite way in which it was done, we see nothing wrong.
A greeting.
Paul ... cusufai



avatarsupporter
sent on August 18, 2024 (16:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

................... I dust off this photo why? It's a nice photo ............................




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me