What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 18, 2015 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This in my opinion is well worth it! From my point of view you have dosed to perfection both the B & W that the shutter (essential in these shots). The composition personally has "something wrong" but I could not tell good or what, or how I would have acted. It is probably due to the two rock walls to right and left that are too "important" in the scene and distract a bit ', but I do not think you've got other ways to shoot. I renew my congratulations, bravo! Questa secondo me merita davvero molto! Dal mio punto di vista hai dosato alla perfezione sia il B&W che il tempo di scatto (fondamentale in questi scatti). La composizione personalmente ha "qualcosa che non va" ma non saprei dirti bene né cosa, né come avrei agito io. Probabilmente è dovuta alle due pareti rocciose a dx e sx che sono troppo "importanti" nella scena e distraggono un po', ma non credo tu abbia avuto altri modi di scattare. Rinnovo i miei complimenti, bravo! |
| sent on September 18, 2015 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and complimented Michael, I had not noticed maybe try to cut it out. We say that the shot was a bit 'forced by the fact that I could neither include the sky (monotonous and useless), nor lower it because I wanted to frame the curves of the river before the jump, the ratio two-thirds did the rest, to 70, however, was completely another picture and I was not convinced! I've done well at 35 and 16, but while framing the whole jump (was high), did not make the size, in the end this is the one that convinced me more. Thanks again minister, David. Grazie del passaggio e dei complimenti Michele, non ci avevo fatto caso magari provo a ritagliarla. Diciamo che l'inquadratura è stata un po' forzata dal fatto che non potevo nè includere il cielo (monotono e inutile), nè abbassarla in quanto volevo inquadrare le curve del fiume prima del salto, il rapporto due terzi ha fatto il resto, a 70 invece era completamente un'altra foto e non mi ha convinto! Ne ho fatte anche a 35 e 16, ma pur inquadrando l'intero salto (era altissima), non rendeva la dimensione, alla fine questa è quella che mi ha convinto di più. Grazie ancora del consiglio, Davide. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
