JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 21, 2012 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Silvia, the flowers are very beautiful in itself .. is the composition that does not convince me.
In the Macro shots you need to focus mainly on one point ... the point that generally attracts more attention or where you would like to drop more the eye.
SE in your case the aim is to attract the attention of all the flowers you'd have to close the aperture more ... I do not see what is the value of the diaphragm in this shot, but I think no more than f / 8. However beautiful flowers! ;-) Daniele Ciao Silvia, i fiori in sè sono molto belli..è la composizione che non mi convince.
Negli scatti Macro devi concentrarti principalmente su un punto...generalmente il punto che attira di più l'attenzione o dove vorresti fare cadere maggiormente l'occhio.
SE nel tuo caso l'intento è quello di attirare l'attenzione su tutti i fiori avresti dovuto chiudere il diaframma maggiormente... Non vedo a quanto è il valore del diaframma in questo scatto ma credo che non superi f/8. Comunque bei fiori! Daniele
sent on May 21, 2012 (18:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Silvia, I agree with Daniel, you do not understand, at least I, where is the point of MAF and in order to give a correct interpretation of the photo would agree to put the shooting data! Hello SuperC. ;-) Ciao Silvia, concordo con Daniele, non si capisce,almeno io, dov'è il punto di MAF e, per poter dare la giusta lettura della foto converrebbe mettere i dati di scatto! Ciao SuperC.
sent on May 22, 2012 (20:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You are right there is a precise point of focus! was the first day I tried the new lens! :) The problem is that I do not remember what I have the set, but more than f / 8 I do not think .. the problem is that the 400D does not have live viwe so it's a little chaos to understand that if you're putting well focused or not! but I'll try .. thanks for the advice! Avete ragione non c'è un punto preciso di messa a fuoco! era il primo giorno che ho provato il nuovo obiettivo! :)il problema è che non mi ricordo a quanto l ho impostato, ma piu di f/8 non credo.. il problema è che la 400D non ha il live viwe quindi è un po un caos capire che se stai mettendo bene a fuoco o no! ma ci provo.. grazie per i consigli!
sent on May 22, 2012 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello silvia the composition is not 'bad I agree with friends for a point (Failure) MAF, attraction. Anyway with Canon should have had the program for free PLR ??to FILE> INFO gives you the shooting data. good photos free ciao silvia la composizione non e' male concordo con gli amici per un punto(mancato) di MAF, di attrazione. Cmq con Canon dovresti aver avuto il programma in omaggio DPP che in FILE>INFO ti da i dati di scatto. buone foto franco