What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 06, 2015 (20:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The good maf, the compo and detail. I would reduce digital noise in the background, but only water. (Imho). It seems a common pelican. hello, laurel Buoni la maf, la compo e il dettaglio. Ridurrei il rumore digitale ma solo sullo sfondo acqueo. (imho) . Mi sembra un pellicano comune . ciao, lauro |

| sent on September 06, 2015 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |

| sent on September 07, 2015 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
luigi. Thank you for picking me up.
elleemme. Yes you are right with regard to the noise. I will try to redo the PP! Thank you too! @luigi. Grazie per il passaggio.
@elleemme. Si hai ragione per quanto riguarda il rumore. Proverò a rifare la PP! Grazie anche a te! |

| sent on December 10, 2015 (17:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Good the maf, the compo and detail. I would reduce digital noise in the background, but only water. (Imho). It seems a common pelican. hello, laurel „
exactly what I wanted to say! how nice 200mm " Buoni la maf, la compo e il dettaglio. Ridurrei il rumore digitale ma solo sullo sfondo acqueo. (imho) . Mi sembra un pellicano comune . ciao, lauro"
esattamente quello che volevo dirti ! che bello 200mm |

| sent on December 12, 2015 (8:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. a curly pelican Ciao. É un pellicano riccio |

| sent on December 12, 2015 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ian. Completely agree!
Roberto. Thank you for the information!
Good day! @Ian. Pienamente d'accordo!
@Roberto. Grazie per l'informazione!
Buona giornata! |

| sent on September 08, 2016 (22:35) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |

| sent on September 09, 2016 (10:40) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |

| sent on September 09, 2016 (12:49) | This comment has been translated
Great photo! |

| sent on September 09, 2016 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Camillo, Luigi and Marco: With the passage.
Have a nice weekend!
AB @Camillo, Luigi e Marco: grazie del passaggio.
Buon Weekend!
AB |

| sent on March 21, 2017 (8:44)
Excellent image in habitat with beautiful colors and details.
Regards,
Satish. |

| sent on March 21, 2017 (9:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful. Excellent Maf on the subject. I agree with the Elleemme reduce water noise. Greetings Marco. Bella. Ottima la Maf sul soggetto. Concordo con Elleemme sul ridurre il rumore sull'acqua. Un saluto Marco. |

| sent on March 21, 2017 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pelican, gorgeous photos Pellicano riccio, stupenda foto |

| sent on October 02, 2017 (13:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
curly pelican, I think so much bURT, who lives and floats in the corturago peat and also on the big lake, there is a lot of noise in the picture, was underestimated? .. usually the m1 starts to give problems after 2000 iso pellicano riccio, mi sembra tanto bURT, che vive e svolazza nella torbiera di corturago e anche sul lago maggiore, dalla foto c'e molto rumore, era sottoesposta?.. di solito la m1 inizia a dare problemi dopo 2000 iso |

user68000 | sent on September 22, 2019 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
here: I was interested to see how long an OB makes as cheap as this, attached to the EM-1 I guess with the Olympus adapter
doesn't look badto me
I'd be better off than you can get with the 75-300 ecco: mi interessava vedere quanto rende un OB lungo a economico come questo, attaccato alla EM-1 immagino con l'adattatore Olympus
non mi sembra male
direi meglio di quanto si possa ottenere con il 75-300 |

| sent on June 07, 2020 (11:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello everyone,
sottented but I stayed away from the forum for quite some time.
The photo was taken at 500 ISO and was slightly underexposed. The day was not particularly bright.
This goal I would say it can give good results but slightly closing the diaphragm. I also felt the same for the 50 mm f1.8.
Then the problem of the manual MAF at 400 mm remains. So many photos I had to discard.
Thanks for comments
AB Ciao a tutti,
scusate ma sono rimasto lontano dal forum per parecchio tempo.
La foto è stata scattata a 500 ISO ed era leggermente sottoesposta. La giornata non era particolarmente luminosa.
Questo obiettivo direi che può dare buoni risultati ma chiudendo leggermente il diaframma. Ho costatato la stessa cosa anche per il 50 mm f1.8.
Rimane poi il problema della MAF manuale a 400 mm. Tante foto le ho dovute scartare ..
Grazie per i commenti
AB |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
