RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Forte di Bard...

Europa

View gallery (24 photos)



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on September 01, 2015 (8:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice, a great atmosphere; for what I know if I do not want to burn the moon have to do a double exposure ;-)
Hello, Charles.

avatarsenior
sent on September 01, 2015 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice balance of elements and colors hot / cold. A little 'blurred.

avatarsenior
sent on September 01, 2015 (10:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks a lot guys, aprezzo much passing and suggestions! good day

avatarsupporter
sent on September 01, 2015 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Cristina
The photo I like, without repeating myself agree with Talisman, excuse me if I would, I do not understand F3.5, ISO 100 with the tripod just, you could use a smaller aperture, at least one F8, perhaps by using a remote shutter release, but not if you already know.
If it's your choice, but I sometimes have chosen well, but mistakenly choice -D ;-)
A greeting
SctVtr 8-) ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 01, 2015 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good point Vittorio! I'm getting just the comments I need :-) ;-)
I'll explain: as a "textbook" I started with the diaphragm rather closed, getting a good sharpness and the classical "star lights" ... the problem is that it seemed that even the moon had the rays! : Fconfuso: :-(
I switched to shutter priority and ... I got this, a mediocre compromise fconfuso:
So I have to do to force a double exposure? Anyway, how can I not burn the moon ??

Thanks so much for your intervention!

avatarsupporter
sent on September 01, 2015 (21:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For the moon the double exposure and a must, because the meter reads the most light strongest, only in other words, those of the specific techniques ........... !!!!!
The star is also now less evident but there is, for those have not do not know how you do, rightly opening you see less or disappear, stopping down the more you will see that is more detailed, that effect is given by aperture blades.
This is what is in my knowledge, perhaps someone more experienced will give you an explanation, more suitable :-(
A greeting
SctVtr 8-) ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on September 01, 2015 (23:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Cristina, the picture is very beautiful as well as you shoot. The moon is not too deformed due to exposure and not to burn you should use similar times a recovery day (getting rid of that beautiful atmosphere that you got). In my opinion a double exposure would have given effect to a photomontage, which may or may not.
I congratulate you for this beautiful shot :-) Hello!

avatarsenior
sent on September 02, 2015 (14:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Vittorio, thanks again for the thorough explanation, not everyone ;-)

Claudio, thank you to you for the detailed comment. Double exposures in fact I avoid always right because I'm afraid to obtain a montage that I do not like at all! And then I do not know how to do them ... -D

Good day to all :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 03, 2015 (23:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Cristina,
is just the value of 6 seconds of exposure?

Hello,
Emanuele

avatarsenior
sent on September 04, 2015 (9:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Emanuel, I double-checked: 6/2.
Suggestions?
Good day :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 04, 2015 (19:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

With 6/2 f / 3.5 I thought that the street lights are burned more.
To the moon it takes a very short time. But it does not seem very bright.
Good evening to you too.

avatarsupporter
sent on September 05, 2015 (5:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Cristina a nice picture that marks the return of color :-) In fact with a double exposure would have tamed the exuberance of the moon and a wire lowered the glow of the street lamps.
Hello hello (from quite a ways away ;-))

avatarsenior
sent on September 05, 2015 (8:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very good

avatarsupporter
sent on September 05, 2015 (9:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful location and good composition, there was a smaller aperture, for the moon serves exposure to part with much shorter time, however, especially in the presence of haze is not easy to handle it, and if it leaves the risk of very bright 'montage effect is ;-)
Congratulations, hello.
Ps I cloned a two pylons would give ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 05, 2015 (10:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The moon is overexposed but not burned, the image is very well made and with a nice atmosphere, congratulations
(I too would have cloned the pylons)

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2015 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much for responding to my many requests for help and clarification! I fear that the double exposures they do for me, too afraid to make a mess in post :-(

Bloodhounds pylons ... I also thought I have to clone because its bad but I never know when / how it is permissible to intervene to make corrections of this kind ...

Greetings to everyone, near and far away !!!

avatarsupporter
sent on September 09, 2015 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I see you're in Valle d'Aosta. The moon would receive advice certainly better than mine.
Have fun, hello.

avatarsenior
sent on September 09, 2015 (12:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello a beautiful composition, congratulations for the realization.
Best wishes. Adri

avatarsupporter
sent on September 09, 2015 (12:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A moon like me so! Much more romantic and it is not particularly burned. The right advice you have already given them ... and then always intervenes personal taste! Do you wonder if you took the stabilizer having used the tripod, because the two things do not go unfortunately agree and you risk the micro moved! The cloning there is great, without thinking much. For double exposure must take my hand, but in this case I would not have done because I like the brightness and thus justifies the moonlight cold that seems to flood the compo ... brackets in contrast with the warm artificial light. The diaphragm in this case was more close ... When you do not fell prey to hurry, you can always do some experiments (of time and diaphragm) and then observe them with attentionthe monitor at home to understand the best and worst of the same shot, and evaluate what to do in the future ... Hello dear! :-P ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 09, 2015 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Cristina! :-P
This picture is just beautiful .. :-) sometimes the moon with halos is very photogenic .. gives the sense of the night .. everything else in this picture is well balanced .. I like! Studied the hyperfocal (Wikipedia, for example) to f3.5 since it does not have a foreground elements could use the .. however, even so I see everything clear in your photos .. I know you've already used the hyperfocal! 8-)
I have a beautiful moon to 1/100 sec at ISO 100, but there was a little mist sometimes also serves 1/250 sec at ISO 100!
It took short, the double exposure! You can try to make 2 different espoaizioni and merge them with Picturenaut .. is a small free program that does all it .. if you use choose the setting "photoreceptors" .. hello! :-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me