What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 27, 2015 (18:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shoot. It gives a good idea of ??the curvature. Can I ask why f22? Bella ripresa. Rende bene l'idea della curvatura. Posso chiederti come mai f22? |
| sent on August 27, 2015 (18:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With Blixa. f / 22, yet I ask myself, because in hindsight I would have stopped at f / 11! The photos in London I've taken some time ago, and I was not very knowledgeable at the time: since I had no time, going to run, I alternated quickly between shooting at people in the street in architecture shots, and then by apertures in baffles closed. To make this transition quickly (and foolishly!) I threw up in the ring where he allowed me, without thinking too much (I was in aperture priority) ...
I know I push the diaphragm means accentuating diffraction, in this photo where you think is painful? Nothing to do with the purple streaks on the windows down? And what do you think are other disadvantages of the f / 22 here (besides letting me take time to safety limit)? Grazie Blixa. f/22, me lo chiedo pure io, perché col senno di poi mi sarei fermato a f/11! Le foto a Londra le ho scattate qualche tempo fa, e non ero molto ferrato ai tempi: visto che avevo poco tempo, andando di corsa, alternavo velocemente tra scatti alle persone in strada a scatti all'architettura, e quindi da diaframmi aperti a diaframmi chiusi. Per fare questa transizione velocemente (e scioccamente!) buttavo fino a dove la ghiera mi consentiva, senza pensarci troppo (ero in priorità di diaframmi)...
So che spingere i diaframmi significa accentuare la diffrazione, in questa foto dove pensi venga sofferta? C'entrano gli aloni violacei sulle finestre in basso? E quali sono secondo te altri svantaggi dell'f/22 qui (oltre ad avermi fatto scattare al tempo limite di sicurezza)? |
| sent on August 27, 2015 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I did not notice anything special, it was just simple curiosity :-) Well, in addition to long time (I usually with focal 50mm snap to at least 1/100 without stabilizer) also ISO oh well, in this case are so low at 125, but still worse than 100 ;-) Non ho notato niente di particolare, era solo semplice curiosità Beh, oltre al tempo lungo (io normalmente con focale 50mm scatto ad almeno 1/100 senza stabilizzatore) anche gli ISO che vabbè, in questo caso sono a 125 quindi bassi, ma comunque sempre peggio di 100 |
| sent on August 27, 2015 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course! Thank you for picking me up ;-) Eh già! Grazie per il passaggio |
| sent on September 07, 2015 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The point of view enhances the shape. Beautiful! :-) Il punto di vista esalta la forma. Bella! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
