RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » Untitled Photo

 
Untitled Photo...

ARACNIDI

View gallery (15 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on August 26, 2015 (8:40) by Davide Falossi. 10 comments, 746 views.

, 1/20 f/7.1, ISO 400, tripod.

Non conosco la specie, penso si tratti di un ragno granchio





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on August 26, 2015 (11:26)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Un pannello riflettente avrebbe attenuato l'ombra.

A reflector would have mitigated the shadow.

avatarsenior
sent on August 26, 2015 (13:13)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ciao Davide, il ragno è un Thomisidae, gli appartenenti a questa Famiglia, sono appunto chiamati anche crab spiders per la caratteristica postura delle zampe anteriori.
Riguardo invece la specie che hai fotografato, è un:

Xysticus kochi

Ciao, Claudio;-)

Hello David, the spider is a Thomisidae, the members of this family, also called crab spiders are precisely the characteristic posture of the front legs.
Instead about the species that you photographed, it is a:

Xysticus kochi

Hello, Claudio ;-)

avatarjunior
sent on August 26, 2015 (16:05)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie mille per l'individuazione della specie e per il " mi piace " Claudio.

Thank you so much for the identification of the species and for the "like" Claudio.

avatarjunior
sent on August 26, 2015 (16:08)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Pigi47, credo che quì al massimo più che l'ombra sia un po' altina la luce che riflette sulla pianta. Il pannello non sarebbe servito in quanto la foto è scattata con il sole già sotto l'orizzonte e la luce era bassa.

Pigi47, I think here at most more than the shadow is a bit 'Altina light reflecting on the plant. The panel would not be served because the photo is taken with the sun already below the horizon and the light was low.

avatarsupporter
sent on August 27, 2015 (15:00)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Era un semplice consiglio per visualizzare meglio il soggetto. Il tutto nasce dal fatto che sulla dx vedo una parte più luminosa ed a sx per forza di cose più ombreggiata a questo punto pensavo che un po' più di luce sul soggetto avesse avuto la sua importanza per mettere in evidenza maggiormente la sua morfologia.
Comunque non serve la luce diretta del sole sul pannello, basta quella del cielo e visto che non era notte avrebbe risolto quello che personalmente ritenevo utile.

It was a simple piece of advice to better visualize the subject. All this stems from the fact that on the right I see a brighter side to the left and inevitably more shaded at this point I thought a bit 'more light on the subject he was important to highlight more its morphology.
However it serves the direct sunlight on the panel, just as the sky and saw that it was night would solve what I personally thought was useful.

avatarjunior
sent on August 27, 2015 (18:16)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Si probabilmente hai ragione per quanto riguarda la morfologia del soggetto che con un pannello sarebbe stata maggiormente accentuata. Io però alle volte sono un po' restio ad eliminare o ad attenuare a tutti i costi alcune ombre, perchè mi pare che a volte, non sempre, tendano a restituire delle immagini poco realistiche. Anche l'uso del flash non è da me in genere molto gradito a prescindere dai casi in cui è indispensabile, proprio perchè mi piace la luce naturale con tutte le sue sfumature che per forza di cose contengono anche ombre.
Ovviamente questo fa pare di una mia del tutto personale concezione della fotografia e non pretendo che chi da consigli che rispettano i canoni possa condividerla.
Detto questo a mio parere questa foto è un po' sovraesposta per le alte luci e penso che avrei avuto l'effetto da me desiderato sottoesponendo e magari aggiungendo un pannello davanti alsoggetto per non sottoesporlo troppo.

You're probably right as regards the morphology of the subject with a panel would be more pronounced. But I sometimes have a little 'reluctant to eliminate or mitigate some shadows at all costs, because I think that sometimes, not always, tend to return the image unrealistic. The use of flash is not from me generally very welcome regardless of where it is essential, just because I like natural light with all its nuances that inevitably also contain shadows.
Obviously, this does seem to my very personal conception of photography and do not pretend that those who give advice that respect the canons can share it.
That said I think this photo is a bit 'over-exposed for the highlights and I think I would have had the effect desired by me underexposing and perhaps adding a front panel for alsoggetto not sottoesporlo too.

avatarsenior
sent on June 10, 2016 (12:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful, amazing colors of this little spider, bravo and compliementi!

avatarjunior
sent on June 10, 2016 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for commentoAlpha, glad that you piacia

avatarsenior
sent on June 11, 2016 (11:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very beautiful, awesome
greetings from Reino mountaineer

avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2016 (22:42) | This comment has been translated

Thanks Reino


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me