What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 20, 2015 (22:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excuse me but I looked through the tunnel and all seem blurred. Scusami ma ho guardato tutta la galleria e mi sembrano tutte sfuocate. |
| sent on August 20, 2015 (23:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also noticed that the model in the whole series appears blurred: just look at his hair appearing as "muddy." It 'a desired effect, David Hamilton style, or is it a technical problem?
Greetings, Paul Anch'io ho notato che la modella in tutta la serie appare sfuocata: basta osservare i capelli che appaiono come "impastati" . E' un effetto voluto, stile David Hamilton, o è un inconveniente tecnico ?
Un saluto, Paolo |
| sent on August 20, 2015 (23:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
1/25 more than blurry moved 1/25 più che sfocata è mossa |
| sent on August 21, 2015 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
slightly sfocatino you wanted, but the hair matted booo not see them?
leggermente sfocatino si voluto, ma i capelli impastati non li vedo booo?
|
| sent on August 21, 2015 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I may make a suggestion to the author, since I noticed some of his blurry photos while perhaps is in focus, as in this case, the rock where sat the model to set the focus on the central point, leaving vice versa do to automatic camera can happen that the automatic AF to focus the main subject, but something different. ;-)
Se posso permettermi di dare un suggerimento all'autore, visto che ho notato alcune delle sue foto sfocate mentre magari è a fuoco, come in questo caso, il masso dove è seduta la modella di impostare la messa a fuoco sul punto centrale, viceversa lasciando fare agli automatismi della fotocamera può capitare che l'automatismo AF non metta a fuoco il soggetto principale ma qualcosa di diverso. 
|
| sent on August 21, 2015 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
then I would agree to all point in the manual, so gestirmela 100% allora sto punto converrebbe tutto sul manuale,in modo da gestirmela al 100% |
| sent on August 21, 2015 (23:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But in my opinion it is not only the total automation of the points that creates problem. Just use the central Ma no secondo me è solo il totale automatismo dei punti che crea problema. Basta usare il centrale |
| sent on August 22, 2015 (14:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but using the central sfoco else, the problem is that I was trying to focus on everything but I see that sometimes certain points blurs ma usando il centrale il resto sfoco,il problema è quello cercavo di mettere a fuoco il tutto ma vedo che a volte certi punti sfoca |
| sent on August 22, 2015 (14:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In a portrait it is usually considered a mistake to have to fire both the subject and the background. Unless the background is not particularly beautiful and interesting to add it in detail in the picture. If so you have to use an optical shorter and a smaller aperture, then you'll have everything in focus. In un ritratto normalmente è considerato un errore avere a fuoco sia il soggetto sia lo sfondo. A meno che lo sfondo non sia particolarmente bello e interessante da inserirlo dettagliatamente nella foto. Se così fosse devi usare un ottica più corta e un diaframma più chiuso, allora si che avrai tutto a fuoco. |
| sent on August 22, 2015 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Exact at f4 you can not get to fire then f8 was a right choice for your intentions Esatto a f4 non riesci ad avere a fuoco allora f8 era una scelta più corretta per tue intenzioni |
| sent on August 22, 2015 (15:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In theory, in practice I do not think is feasible. If f / 4 the photo was taken with 1/25 ", with f / 8 you will have to halve twice the shutter speed 1/15" - f / 5.6 and 1/8 "with f / 8. In summary if It is this move with a time of 1.25 "I will even move with a slower tempo. In teoria si, in pratica non credo sia fattibile. Se con f/4 la foto è stata scattata con 1/25", con f/8 si dovrà dimezzare due volte il tempo di scatto 1/15" - f/5.6 e 1/8" con f/8. In sintesi se è mossa questa con il tempo di 1/25" penso sarà ancora più mossa con un tempo più lento. |
| sent on August 22, 2015 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Just raise the ISO. ISO 800 and 2 recoveries already stop.
She lights up the panel, piece of foil or what you want and keep faster having darker background and less intrusive Basta alzare gli ISO. ISO 800 e già recuperi 2 stop.
Lei la illumini con pannello, pezzo di stagnola o quel che vuoi e tieni tempi più rapidi avendo fondo più scuro e meno invadente |
| sent on August 23, 2015 (15:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in fact are experiments that will try again to thank you guys infatti sono esperimenti che riprovero fare grazie ragazzi |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
