What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 247000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 03, 2012 (0:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I took this photo just to test the Kenko just arrived and I did not bother to stay to pull out the tripod, but I think that even a free hand there is not much blur. Ho fatto questa foto giusto per testare il Kenko appena arrivato e non mi sono preoccupato di stare a tirar fuori il treppiede, ma mi sembra che anche a mano libera non ci sia molto micromosso. |
| sent on May 03, 2012 (1:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello a question ... With the multiplier will remain the AF with the 150-500?? Ciao una domanda... Con il moltiplicatore ti resta l'AF con il 150-500??? |
| sent on May 03, 2012 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No it is, I also tried the method of scotch on the three pin but that did not work either. No non resta, ho provato anche con il metodo dello scotch sui tre pin ma non funziona nemmeno quello. |
| sent on May 04, 2012 (2:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Got it! Thank you! : D Capito! Grazie! :D |
user6267 | sent on February 04, 2013 (21:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
seems even sharper this freehand rather than the next shot with the tripod wow!
congratulations! ;-) sembrerebbe addirittura più nitida questa a mano libera piuttosto che la successiva scattata con il treppiede complimenti! |
| sent on February 04, 2013 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much, in fact I was surprised but I think I also depend on the atmosphere, or I do not remember what it's called cosmic wind or something like that and also the position of the moon from day to day, there are differences of incredible sharpness. In fact, if I remember correctly the other I took it when the moon was very low because I wanted to take advantage of the larger size lens effect on the atmosphere but probably this effect the lens covers a bit 'and is softer. This is my theory, but I do not know if it is right. Grazie mille, infatti sono rimasto sorpreso pure io ma secondo me dipende dall'atmosfera, o non mi ricordo come si chiama vento cosmico o qualcosa del genere e anche della posizione della luna, da un giorno all'altro ci sono differenze di nitidezza incredibili. Infatti se ricordo bene l'altra l'ho scattata quando la luna era in posizione molto bassa perchè volevo sfruttare la grandezza maggiore data dall'effetto lente dell'atmosfera ma probabilmente questo effetto lente la copre un po' e risulta meno nitida. Questa è la mia teoria ma non so se è giusta. |
| sent on February 04, 2013 (23:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent moon mostly handheld shooting! Surely you are getting a good seeing (ie the weather dates to be current more or less high). You do not recommend to take celestial objects when they are low because the shooting conditions are much worse than a body higher. Ottima luna perlopiù ripresa a mano libera ! Sicuramente hai trovato un seeing buono ( ovvero le condizioni atmosferiche date da correnti piu o meno alte). Ti sconsiglio di riprendere gli oggetti celesti quando sono bassi perchè le condizioni di ripresa sono nettamente peggiori di un corpo piu alto. |
| sent on February 04, 2013 (23:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well then I was wrong, my theory is correct in fact I had read something like this a long time ago and I did not remember wrong. Beh allora non mi ero sbagliato, la mia teoria è esatta infatti avevo letto qualcosa del genere parecchio tempo fa e non mi ricordavo male. |
user28347 | sent on November 07, 2013 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
this is the best of the moons. was difficult even with a 500, hello questa è la migliore delle lune .è difficilissimo anche con un 500 ,ciao |
| sent on November 10, 2013 (22:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Sergio. Grazie Sergio. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |