What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 26, 2015 (20:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful photo !! ;-)
a greeting
Andrea bellissima foto !! 
un saluto
Andrea |
| sent on July 26, 2015 (23:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Andrea, too good: - |
but very glad you like ;-)
Thanks again, greetings, G.Piero Ti ringrazio Andrea, troppo buono
ma ben contento che ti piaccia
Grazie di nuovo, un saluto, G.Piero |
| sent on July 28, 2015 (0:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and very unusual! :-) ;-) Bellissima e veramente inusuale! |
| sent on August 19, 2015 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
G.Piero very interesting, a different photo from olives that you see of this wonderful country, apt the choice b / w
Compliments
Hello
Ale Molto interessante G.Piero, una foto diversa dalle olive che si vede di questo meraviglioso paese, azzeccata anche la scelta b/n
Complimenti
Ciao
Ale |
| sent on August 25, 2015 (10:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Ale, you too sorry for the long delay: - |
thank you in the visit, and the nice comment,
both more than welcome ;-)
Greetings, happy holidays, good light, hello, G.Piero Grazie mille Ale, scusami pure tu per il forte ritardo
nel ringraziarti della visita, e del bel commento,
entrambi più che graditi
Un saluto, buone vacanze, buona luce, ciao, G.Piero |
| sent on August 30, 2015 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
An excellent bn !!! Un'ottimo bn!!! |
| sent on August 30, 2015 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Alessio, of the visit and the very welcome assessment ;-)
Greetings, G.Piero Grazie Alessio, della visita e della graditissima valutazione
Un saluto, G.Piero |
| sent on September 01, 2015 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gpiero excuse, is the first time I talk about technical means, before I tell you that I like the pictures. They are torn between the Canon 135/2 and 135/2 Zeiss, or your. It attracts me autofocus. What do you think? Thank you- Scusa Gpiero, è la prima volta che parlo di mezzo tecnico, prima ti dico che mi piace la foto. Sono indeciso tra il Canon 135/2 e lo Zeiss 135/2, oppure il tuo. Mi attira l'autofocus. Cosa pensi? Grazie- |
| sent on September 01, 2015 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here we are:
Of course even a C.Zeiss T * Apochromatic, says a very long on the final quality that I believe still unsurpassed ;-)
But it is not autofocus, but if you do not practice the "photo hunting" by stalking (your "hunting" is the absolute best: -D ... trust ... ;-) envy you and even there "Rosica": - D for your fantastic "prey" -D: -D: -D)), personally I would prefer it to any other 135mm currently on the market.
My 135 f2.8 gets along pretty well, at least to me is more than enough ... that maybe if mounted on an SLR sensor with better performance of my 500D, could give even more ... also costs nonsense, the which never hurts ;-).
But if you believe the9; autofocus necessary, then go to Canon's not wrong.
But if you love that special light, the distinctive coloring of Zeiss, then fregatene autofocus -D and get yourself without too many second thoughts. Or ... or go with Sony FF, as the A99 (soon due out A99II) and there you place the 135 f1.8, always C.Zeiss T *, autofocus, another excellent 135, top of the range ... and there think more ;-)
I hope I was of some use to solve your "dilemma" ;-)
good continuation, Franco, good light hello, G.Piero Eccoci qua:
Certo che un C.Zeiss T* addirittura Apocromatico, la dice molto lunga sulla qualità finale che ritengo ancora insuperata
Però non è autofocus, ma se non pratichi la "caccia fotografica" da appostamento ( la tua "caccia" è la migliore in assoluto ... fidati... ti invidio e persino ci "rosico" per le tue fantastiche "prede" )), personalmente lo preferirei a qualunque altro 135mm attualmente sul mercato.
Il mio 135 f2.8 se la cava abbastanza bene, almeno a me basta e avanza... che se magari montato su una reflex con sensore più performante della mia 500D, potrebbe dare persino di più... inoltre costa una sciocchezza, il che non guasta mai.
Se però ritieni l'autofocus indispensabile, allora vai di Canon che non sbagli.
Se però ami quella luce particolare, il cromatismo inconfondibile degli Zeiss, allora fregatene dell'autofocus e buttatici, senza troppi ripensamenti. Oppure... oppure vai con Sony FF, come la A99 ( presto uscirà la A99II) e ci piazzi il 135 f1.8, sempre C.Zeiss T*, autofocus, altro eccellente 135, top di gamma... e non ci pensi più
Spero di essere stato in qualche modo utile a risolvere il tuo "dilemma"
buon proseguimento, Franco, buona luce ciao, G.Piero |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
