RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Astrophotography
  4. » Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex II

 
Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex II...

Astrofoto e cielo

View gallery (22 photos)

Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex II sent on July 17, 2015 (23:34) by Aleziggio. 8 comments, 1573 views.

, Posa B f/1.8, ISO 800, tripod.

In questa versione ho optato per una post meno spinta della precedente, diciamo meno "stretchata" come suggerito da Blacksun. I colori dovrebbero risultare più naturali e le velature meno evidenti, giudicate voi



View High Resolution 2.6 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (0:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Alex really better! Good Boy! :-) But the other you have taken? wow!

avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Beppe,
I am glad that the result is improved. As you know these photos require a lot of work, unlike pictures type "street" for example, so it is a shame not to get pleasing results. For those less able to delete the not have a thousand pictures on the profile, I just keep the best ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (15:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok, about my moment I keep them for the sole reason that are the reference to see if I improve with the results as soon as I can afford it ... PixInsight will be my next purchase ... it's no getting around it, not with IRIS c 'I own the good: -D: -D PS and does what it can

avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you say that the difference in results with PixInsight is so marked? I use GIMP for now only because it's totally freeware but I have no idea what you could get with other software and I've never done a comparative test

avatarsupporter
sent on July 18, 2015 (17:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful, good, hello

avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Luke, thank you! :-)

Greetings!

user44198
avatar
sent on July 18, 2015 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alex, if pèosso afford to get into the discussion: I think the difference between elaborative PixInsight and other softwares is that this software was specially designed for astronomical photos, Beppe and I saw firsthand what it means to develop indeed processed image before calibrating and then integrating the frames with a series of algorithms to be afraid, specific to the job you have to make an example to make you understand better: I have 10 frames to align, calibrate and develop a more, well, for that kind of work SIUSA an algorithm almost basic for those 10 frames is enough to give you a very acceptable result by performing a clean background appropriate to the sum of the frame, but if for example I did 80 or even 100 frames and I demand a thorough cleaning and taken care of not leaving out the background color of the stars they use an algorithm more in Flash, pis; powerful enough to ensure a great result !! have a look at my gallery so you realize visually of what I mentioned !!!
the tuaimmagine is very beautiful, but if you allow me I see a chromatic too pronounced on blue stars, evidently is due to your goal that is not designed for deep sky ... But the picture is very pleasant ... ;-); -)
A greeting
Riccardo

avatarsenior
sent on July 18, 2015 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Richard,
thank you very much for your insights! I take this opportunity also to congratulate you on your photographs: here in the forum are one of the "pillars" of astrophotography -D

Greetings to you and good evening!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me