What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 29, 2012 (9:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful capture! beautiful plumage also swollen, I would have darkened a little to make it stand out more head, too bad the noise, very noticeable in the background and the metal object at the base of the roost. hello In Una bellissima cattura !! bello anche le piumaggio rigonfio , avrei scurito un pochino per fare risaltare maggiormente la testa , peccato il rumore , molto evidente ,nello sfondo e l'oggetto metallico alla base del posatoio. ciao Nello |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (10:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a beautiful sight .. not as the photo to the defects already mentioned by Ollen ... un bellissimo avvistamento.. non altrettanto la foto per i difetti già citati da Ollen... |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (10:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Ollen Quoto Ollen |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (11:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Nello, but a very good catch. ;-) Condivido con Nello, però una gran bella cattura. |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as above, excellent capture come sopra, ottima cattura |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (12:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course, in a reason ..... but still a good catch Naturalmente nello a ragione.....ma rimane un ottima cattura |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful subject, I agree with what has already been said! Bellissimo soggetto,concordo con quanto già detto! |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (13:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Ollen Quoto Ollen |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto above, congratulations. Quoto sopra, complimenti. |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good catch. Ottima cattura. |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great capture! pp can greatly migliorere image gran cattura! in pp puoi migliorere notevolmente l'immagine |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In quoto quoto Nello |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You can certainly improve the PP ;-) All that strange noise Puoi migliorare sicuramente la PP Strano tutto quel rumore |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Digital noise is, in my opinion, very intrusive but curiosity leads me to ask why his presence ... you had to lighten it and this is a major crop? What are the reasons that have led you to csattare with these parameters?: 1/2500 f/5.6, ISO 800, handheld As personal interpretation would have chosen the letura spot exposure on the bird of prey with single and af-servant, setting F.8, lowering the ISO to 640. I played with fast pse scurendola in a bit, applying a slight contrast, cropping and reducing noise pate ..
 hello and good light, laurel Il rumore digitale è , secondo me, molto invadente ma la curiosità mi spinge a chiederti il perchè della sua presenza ... hai dovuto schiarirla e questo è un forte crop? Quali sono le ragioni che ti hanno portato a csattare con questi parametri?: 1/2500 f/5.6, ISO 800, mano libera Come interpretazione personale avrei scelto la letura dell'esposizione spot sul rapace con af singolo e ai-servo, impostando f.8, abbassando gli iso a 640. Ho giocato velocemente con pse scurendola un pelino, applicando una leggera mdc, ritagliandola e riducendo pate del rumore..
 ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on April 29, 2012 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had to lighten the photo does not and is not an exaggeration to crop the photo will be about 50% of the original. Unfortunately, I uploaded a version in which I had reduced the noise, when I realized I was not able to change it with the best. I took in 1/2500 "because I still set the speed that I was using to take them up in the air. When you are lying I have not had the coolness to change shooting settings, it is not a stuffed specimen was highly likely that he was placed for a short time (and it did). Note: the version in place of the picture I uploaded to my portfolio in the first place. La foto non ho dovuta schiarirla e non è un crop esagerato, la foto sarà circa il 50% dell'originale. Purtroppo ho caricato una versione in cui non avevo ridotto il rumore, quando me ne sono accorto non sono stato capace di cambiarla con quella migliore. Ho scattato a 1/2500" perché avevo ancora impostato la velocità che stavo usando per riprenderli in volo. Quando si è posato non ho avuto la freddezza di cambiare le impostazioni di scatto, non essendo un esemplare imbalsamato era altamente probabile che stesse posato per poco tempo (e così ha fatto). NB: la versione a posto della foto l'ho caricata nel mio portfolio in prima posizione. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |