What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 27, 2015 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Test photos, unpretentious artistic ;-) The first floor has been cleared of about 1.5 stops.
A cutout 100% from the center of the picture:
Foto di test, senza pretese artistiche ;-) Il primo piano è stato schiarito di circa 1.5 stop.
Un ritaglio al 100% dal centro della foto:
|
| sent on June 27, 2015 (23:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very interesting these tests, hello Molto interessanti questi test , ciao |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well do not know about you, but I feel really notevole.wow! Be non so voi, ma a mè sembra veramente notevole. |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Juza, a technical question.
Abstract: a 70D you know very well be APSC by 20.2 mpx and density even higher than that of 5DS / r in question. What changes between these two sensors?
That is, I'll explain: if I were to make a crop sensor 5DS so that the output image appears the same size as the 70D, what would change?
The estate iso does not seem particularly high, especially counting the fact that the photodiodes have similar size ?! Ciao Juza, una domanda tecnica.
Premessa: una 70D che sai benissimo essere apsc da 20,2 mpx e densità addirittura superiore a quella della 5ds/r in questione. Cosa cambia tra questi due sensori?
Cioè mi spiego meglio: se dovessi fare un crop del sensore della 5ds in modo che l'immagine prodotta risulti della stessa dimensione dell'immagine della 70D, cosa cambierebbe?
La tenuta iso non mi sembra tanto più alta, soprattutto contando il fatto che i fotodiodi hanno dimensioni simili?! |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (21:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ if I were to make a crop sensor 5DS so that the output image appears the same size as the 70D, what would change? „
They would be roughly equal, even as noise.
“ The estate ISO does not seem so much higher „
100% is the same, but if you look at the final photo at the same size the 5Ds has a lead of about 1 - 1.5 stop. " se dovessi fare un crop del sensore della 5ds in modo che l'immagine prodotta risulti della stessa dimensione dell'immagine della 70D, cosa cambierebbe? "
sarebbero pressapoco uguali, anche come rumore.
" La tenuta iso non mi sembra tanto più alta"
al 100% è uguale, però se guardi la foto finale a parità di dimensioni la 5Ds ha un vantaggio di circa 1 - 1.5 stop. |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ is equal to 100%, but if you look at the final photo at the same size the 5Ds has a lead of about 1 - 1.5 stop. „
You mean in the recovery of the shadows?
If no I did not understand the concept.
" al 100% è uguale, però se guardi la foto finale a parità di dimensioni la 5Ds ha un vantaggio di circa 1 - 1.5 stop."
Intendi nel recupero delle ombre?
Se no non ho capito il concetto.
|
| sent on June 28, 2015 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
not, as the amount of noise ... resizing the file from the 5Ds 50 MP 20 MP, the noise decreases by 1 stop abundant, so it is much better than the 70D 20 MP. no, come quantità di rumore...ridimensionando il file da 50 MP della 5Ds a 20 MP, il rumore diminuisce di 1 stop abbondante, quindi risulta decisamente migliore rispetto ai 20 MP della 70D. |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (22:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok now I understand. With the Enlightenment. ;-) Ok ora ho capito. Grazie dei lumi.  |
| sent on June 28, 2015 (22:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
it seems to me there is more detail than a 24MP sensor but also a quintal of noise, see dotted sky, not to mention the lack of sharpness ... shake-given rule out the use of the tripod
a me sembra ci sia un dettaglio maggiore rispetto ad un sensore da 24mp ma pure una quintalata di rumore, vedi cielo puntinato, per non parlare della carenza di nitidezza...escluderei micromosso dato l'utilizzo del treppiede
|
| sent on June 28, 2015 (22:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a machine that is satisfying expectations. I would like to see how the autofocus works in bursts at approaching individuals È una macchina che sta soddisfando le aspettative. Vorrei vedere come lavora l'autofocus in raffica a soggetti in avvicinamento |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
50.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
