RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio con elementi umani
  4. » The ruins on the hill

 
The ruins on the hill...

Vedute

View gallery (10 photos)



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 204000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on June 22, 2015 (17:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful compo and PDR ... hello

avatarjunior
sent on September 09, 2018 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Old Apex!

avatarsenior
sent on May 16, 2020 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful composition of lights and landscape.
How are you with the 16mm compared to the Sony's 16-50mm at 6000?

avatarsenior
sent on May 16, 2020 (16:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you know I don't have them anymore and when I had them at the beginning I didn't care in the least about solving, ac, blurry quality etc... I was just shooting.
Now that I take care of it, I realize that 90% are still unhelpful mental pippe, since we are in the digital :-D
Perciò is just a fact of needs:
16 50 small, cheap, plus that is motorized. Eye at 16mm distorts a lot, but at the same time it corrects easy.
16 2.8....grandangular, bright, compact cheap.
w what else? eh yes, there's samyang 12 f2 sigma 16 1.4 sigma 19 2.8 samyang 18 FE 2.8.... and also zooms 18 135 and 16 55 2.8 G behave wide-angle side mooolto well compared to once... and in fact with these alternatives of 16 2.8 you have never heard of

avatarjunior
sent on May 16, 2020 (16:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I bought it in kit with the car and got rid of it after a week, it was tremendous at the edges. At 16 I took a lot of photos, I also joined him on the 20th, being fixed optics they were much better. Then I discovered the full frame.

avatarsenior
sent on May 16, 2020 (16:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you so much for your thoughts! I have an aps-c, I'm just in the world of photography. I started with 16-50mm, which despite my inexperience, already did not please me.
I did various researches, and with the budget I could afford, now I have the Sigma 16mm (which then behaves like a 24mm on aps-c), which as soon as I get the chance, I will take various photos outside.
I thought about Rokinon, but I think the Sigma is behaving better.



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me