What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 17, 2015 (15:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
view the photos, I would say that the canon has worthily replaced the old 7d least in noise reduction. A greeting vista la foto, direi che la canon ha degnamente sostituito la vecchia 7d almeno nel contenimento del rumore. un saluto |
| sent on June 17, 2015 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful. But since it was a request and therefore you tried a shot at 2000 ISO may I ask if the work has been in post long or native file was already semi ready? Bellissima. Ma visto che è stata una richiesta e perciò hai cercato uno scatto a 2000 ISO posso chiedere se il lavoro in post è stato lungo o il file natio era già semi pronto? |
| sent on June 17, 2015 (16:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fotoddo: “ ..... I can ask if the work has been in post long or native file it was already semi ready? „ .... excuse meaning "Semipronto" .. ??? : Fconfuso:
No files or finished products ready, there are photos taken correctly or incorrectly :-) Obviously, that is not posted here the Raw Native file but the file final Post Product ....... but, if inherent in native file there are sharp and precise fire certain results are not obtained even with a 1DX MarkXIV - )
I was specifically asked to post a file to 2000 ISO (.... among other things with a crop of 20/30% ..) to see how, after the Post Production, would have been the noise ISO 7D Mark II after my workflow :-P ;-) Thank you for the compliments and Franco Roberto @Fotoddo: " .....posso chiedere se il lavoro in post è stato lungo o il file natio era già semi pronto? " .... scusa che significa "Semipronto"..??? Non esistono file semipronti o pronti, esistono foto scattate correttamente o non correttamente Ovvio che quello qui postato non è il file Raw Nativo bensì il file finale Post Prodotto....... ma, se insiti nel file nativo non ci sono nitidezza e fuoco preciso certi risultati non si ottengono nemmeno con una 1DX MarkXIV Mi è stato chiesto espressamente di postare un file a 2000 ISO (.... tra l'altro con un crop del 20/30%..) per vedere come, dopo la Post Produzione, sarebbe risultato il rumore ISO della 7D MarkII dopo il mio flusso di lavoro Grazie a te e Franco per i complimenti Roberto |
| sent on June 17, 2015 (20:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations on the PP. Complimenti per la PP. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (8:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow! there are only 2000 iso, post etc etc, the yield of canon2x with sigma 70/200 is wonderful, of course you can save a shot ragione..nessuna pp mediocre, however 7dII fits well, even in recovery of the shadows is better than the first serie..molto better hello non ci sono solo i 2000 iso, la post etc etc, la resa del canon2x con il sigma 70/200 è splendida, hai ovviamente ragione..nessuna pp può salvare uno scatto mediocre, comunque la 7dII va bene bene , anche nel recupero delle ombre è meglio della prima serie..molto meglio ciao |
| sent on October 12, 2015 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Super throughout. Hello Super in tutto. Ciao |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |