JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on July 06, 2015 (11:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the spirit of circolofotografico comment the picture trying to make constructive criticism;)
Composition: The composition is different from what is seen in most birds, but pleasant. I would have preferred if the eye was the exact center of the picture (so to have more space on and above) but throw it there as a proposal. In this case you have created a diagonal with the subject that comes with the eye in the center. The eye of the beholder picture falls first on the eye of the bird and then move on the body I appreciate the signature lightweight and unobtrusive but
Subject or foreground: (pheasant) The subject is rich in detail and a being of particular defects, maybe I increased slightly the sharpness on the neckslightly out of focus. The colors are natural
Quality and technique: The plants are so out of focus that perhaps slightly closing the diaphragm would have gained slightly in sharpness on the subject without losing the detachment and a background so homogeneous
Post-production: There is some slight noise in the background but not at all annoying
Tips: Difficult to improve a shot well, perhaps a different light in the morning that can give effect "magic". But this does not depend not so much from us. The elements that I listed before are still of little things. Congratulations
I hope I have been helpful and if you are not in aagreement when something I am happy if I write, instill'm trying to learn too
Loris Nello spirito del circolofotografico commento la foto cercando di fare critiche costruttive ;)
Composizione: La composizione è differente da quello che si vede in genere in avifauna, ma gradevole. Avrei forse preferito se l'occhio fosse esattamente al centro della foto (avere quindi più spazio d'avanti e sopra) ma la butto lì come proposta. In questo caso hai creato una diagonale con il soggetto che arriva con l'occhio al centro. Lo sguardo di chi guarda la foto cade dapprima sull'occhio del volatile per poi spostarsi sul corpo Apprezzo la firma leggera e poco invasiva ma che
Soggetto o primo piano: (fagiana) Il soggetto è ricco di dettagli e essente di difetti particolari, forse avrei aumentato leggermente la nitidezza sul collo che esce leggermente dalla messa a fuoco. I colori sono naturali
Qualità e tecnica: Le piante sono talmente fuori fuoco che forse chiudendo leggermente il diaframma avresti guadagnato leggermente in nitidezza sul soggetto senza perdere lo stacco e uno sfondo così omogeneo
Postproduzione: C'è del leggero rumore sullo sfondo ma non è per niente fastidioso
Consigli: Difficile migliorare uno scatto così, forse una luce differente del mattino che riesce a dare un effetto "magia". Ma questo non dipende neanche tanto da noi. Gli elementi che ho elencato prima sono comunque delle piccolezze. Complimenti
Spero di essere stato d'aiuto e se non sei d'accordo su qualcosa sono lieto se me lo scrivi, infondo sto cercando di imparare anch'io