What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 30, 2015 (6:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice pdr, good light and a nice b & n, congratulations hello ;-)
Claudio c Molto bello il pdr , ottima luce e un bel b&n , complimenti ciao 
Claudio c |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (7:28)
Thank you very much Claudio! |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella, I'm sorry, just an exchange of ideas and criticism, in this case, to my subjective view, I tried using the radial filter, placing it on the structure and to the floor, obscuring the rest but not that much, is the pdr so because of the sun that already causes the flare, but not optimal focusing on the floor, always a subjectively pdr lower would emphasize the structure, but I understand that the sun was out, you could try to get a row of exposures Exposure better result, then that PP was elaborated at will, but it is said that my thinking is right, just an idea and just.
A greeting
Vittorio 8-) ;-) Bella, scusami, solo un confronto di idee e non critica, in questo caso, per una mia visione soggettiva, avrei provato con il filtro radiale, posizionandolo sulla struttura e verso il pavimento, oscurando il resto ma non più di tanto, il pdr è cosi per via del sole che già provoca il flare, ma non è ottimale incentrato sul pavimento, sempre soggettivamente un pdr più basso avrebbe enfatizzato la struttura, ma capisco che c'era il sole, si poteva provare un braketing sull'esposizione per avere un risultato migliore, che poi i p.p. si elaborava a piacimento, ma non è detto che il mio pensiero sia giusto, solo un idea e basta.
Un saluto
Vittorio |
user24517 | sent on May 30, 2015 (9:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent ottima |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (10:18)
Vittorio! - Thank you for your comments, made difficult to understand through the Google translation. I don't know what a radial filter is, and I couldn't do multiple exposures as it was handheld and in any case, the people would have moved between exposures. I'm also not sure what you mean by 'flare', as there is none. If it is the overall composition and why there is so much foreground, well, that is just the way I like to sometimes compose images - unusual and a bit unreal, but which I like and I dare to do. "Rules" are often too rigidly adhered to! |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (10:18)
Thank you very much Brie! |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (10:26)
As a point of note, I shot a few and have edited a couple of more of this station and its shadows, including one with the sun and less foreground, and in colour. I will post these up in subsequent days as I want them to appear in the Comment area. |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (10:50)
Thank you, again, Vittorio. Those white spots are slight flare, I also cloned out some more obvious flare blobs, which took some time. As you can imagine, the light and exposure was extreme and I had to work fast with exposure compensation etc at the time. Thank you - and it is good that an image raises debate rather is boring and predictable, perhaps?! |
| sent on May 30, 2015 (10:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
8-) ;-) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
