Podarcis sicula campestris

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

12.3 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (1 photos)

Podarcis sicula campestris sent on April 11, 2012 (11:59) by Sirio. 5 comments, 3643 views.

, 1/400 f/13.0, ISO 400, hand held.

View High Resolution 12.3 MP

17 persons like it: Beldigilberto, Chiodi.andrea, Daniele Fra, Davcam, Diego96, Domenik, Donrobus, Giambi, Gianlucabasso, Jahromi, Leonardo Manetti, Maniscalcosandro, Oceanoprofondo7, Roberto M Parma, Schirox, Simonciniandrea, Todi Leggieri

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Niconico681

sent on April 11, 2012 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Detail thrill!

Sirio

sent on April 12, 2012 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you Nico, but for someone, looking at a maximum resolution is micromossa ... ok, I can not agree with those who say this ... but if we look at all the pictures freehand high resolution what we see? ?? I have the distinct impression that these galleries full resolution it will be fun with the comments! :-D ... if will be commented, of course ;-)

Skender Buci

sent on April 29, 2012 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This new Nikon d800 is really a great machine without detracting from the author! Congratulations!

Rubacolor

sent on May 06, 2012 (17:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sirio: in fact also seems to me a hair move especially looking at the large version, and I believe in that at max resolution (36 megapixel) you would see even more. Here the camera misses and the blame goes to the anti-vibration system that was supposed to run with a time of 1/400. Then go well my theory that the VR and freehand not be trusted! :-) :-). I also have the 105 but honestly almost always work with the tripod and VR off: macro every little vibration is amplified to the square. Furthermore, in my opinion known a PDC to f13 not very wide and less than that which would be obtained with a smaller sensor from D7000.

Roberto M Parma

sent on November 24, 2017 (20:28) | This comment has been translated

Nice close up!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.