Podarcis sicula campestris

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

12.3 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (1 photos)

Podarcis sicula campestris sent on April 11, 2012 (11:59) by Sirio. 5 comments, 3906 views.

, 1/400 f/13.0, ISO 400, hand held.

View High Resolution 12.3 MP

18 persons like it: Beldigilberto, Chiodi.andrea, Daniele Fra, Davcam, Diego96, Domenik, Donrobus, Giambi, Gianlucabasso, Jahromi, Leonardo Manetti, Maniscalcosandro, Oceanoprofondo7, Roberto M Parma, Schirox, Simonciniandrea, StefanoFerioli, Todi Leggieri

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Niconico681

sent on April 11, 2012 (21:56)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

dattagli da brivido!

Detail thrill!

Sirio

sent on April 12, 2012 (19:30)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ti ringrazio Nico, ma per qualcuno, guardandola alla risoluzione massima è micromossa...ok, posso essere d'accordo con chi dice questo...ma se andiamo a vedere tutte le foto scattate a mano libera ad alta risoluzione che cosa notiamo??? Ho la netta impressione che in queste gallerie a tutta risoluzione ci sarà da divertirsi con i commenti! MrGreen

...sempre se verranno commentate, naturalmente ;-)

Thank you Nico, but for someone, looking at a maximum resolution is micromossa ... ok, I can not agree with those who say this ... but if we look at all the pictures freehand high resolution what we see? ?? I have the distinct impression that these galleries full resolution it will be fun with the comments! :-D ... if will be commented, of course ;-)

Skender Buci

sent on April 29, 2012 (21:37)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Questa nuova Nikon d800 è veramente una gran macchina senza nulla togliere al autore!!complimenti !!

This new Nikon d800 is really a great machine without detracting from the author! Congratulations!

Rubacolor

sent on May 06, 2012 (17:01)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Sirio: in effetti anche a me sembra un pelo mossa specie guardando la versione grande e credo in quella a max risoluzione (36 mpx) si vedrebbe ancor di più. Quì la reflex non centra e la colpa va al sistema antivibrazione che avrebbe dovuto funzionare con un tempo di 1/400. Allora torna bene la mia teoria che del VR e della manolibera non c'è da fidarsi!!! Sorriso

. Anche io ho quel 105 ma sinceramente lavoro quasi sempre col cavalletto e con VR spento: in macro ogni piccola vibrazione viene amplificata al quadrato. Inoltre a mio avviso noto una PDC a f13 non molto estesa ed inferiore a quella che si sarebbe ottenuta con una D7000 dal sensore più piccolo.

Sirio: in fact also seems to me a hair move especially looking at the large version, and I believe in that at max resolution (36 megapixel) you would see even more. Here the camera misses and the blame goes to the anti-vibration system that was supposed to run with a time of 1/400. Then go well my theory that the VR and freehand not be trusted! :-) :-). I also have the 105 but honestly almost always work with the tripod and VR off: macro every little vibration is amplified to the square. Furthermore, in my opinion known a PDC to f13 not very wide and less than that which would be obtained with a smaller sensor from D7000.

Roberto M Parma

sent on November 24, 2017 (20:28) | This comment has been translated

Nice close up!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.