What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user59947 | sent on September 04, 2016 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, I like
Ciauuuuuu Ottimo scatto, a me piace
Ciauuuuuu |
| sent on September 05, 2016 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Ardian ...: - | Grazie mille Ardian...  |
| sent on September 09, 2016 (9:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Cute and shooting the subject,
funny caption ;-) Carinissimi lo scatto ed il soggetto,
simpatica la didascalia  |
| sent on September 09, 2016 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Juliet 's appreciation. : - | Grazie Giulietta per l' apprezzamento. |
| sent on September 12, 2016 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition. The image you are suffering from overexposure and whites are burned. You might recover some intervening pp. Try to correct it and ripostarla beside this, given what it cost you the approach to the pretty germane. It's worth. Hello Gios Buona composizione. L'immagine soffre di sovraesposizione e ti si sono bruciati i bianchi. Potresti recuperare in parte intervenendo in pp. Prova correggerla e ripostarla a fianco di questa, visto quello che ti è costato l'approccio al bel germano. Ne vale la pena. Ciao Gios |
| sent on September 13, 2016 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Josh. Yes you are right. The 'warning light / shadow dpp me from actually overexposed, though slightly (on the order of' wing, and a little after that the first stone in the foreground). I do not have a calibrated monitor. So I go on light and shadows depending on what the program says. For shooting colors luck watching a bit of histograms to the full. But it's all so much per meter. :-D When the user mold the Printer monitor ... sooner or later I do a serious monitor.
Out of curiosity for you as it is overexposed? Just to know how much to trust the dpp. : - | Grazie Gios. Si, hai ragione. L' avvertimento luce/ombra di dpp me la da effettivamente sovraesposta, di poco però (sulla fine dell' ala, e un po sul primo sasso dopo quello in primo piano). Non ho un monitor tarato. Quindi su luce e ombre vado in base a cosa dice il programma. Per i colori tiro a fortuna guardando un pò di istogrammi al massimo. Ma è tutto un tanto al metro.  Quando le stampo uso il monitor dello stampatore... prima o poi mi faccio un monitor serio.
Per curiosità per te quanto è sovraesposta? Solo per sapere quanto fidarmi del dpp. |
| sent on September 13, 2016 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Brad Pipis. I think at least 1/2 stop if not more. But if you have one out of calibration screen is difficult to intervene with precision. I do not know if you use PS or another program, but it is not just the exposure you need to take action, but also on the white and black balance, contrast. I hope I was sufficiently exhaustive, greetings, Gios Ciao Brad Pipis. Secondo me almeno 1/2 stop se non di più. Però se hai uno schermo starato è difficile intervenire con precisione. Non so se usi PS o un altro programma, ma non è solo sull'esposizione che devi intervenire, ma anche sul bilanciamento del bianco e del nero, sul contrasto. Spero di essere stato sufficientemente esaustivo, un saluto, Gios |
| sent on September 14, 2016 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, 1/2 should be what I found myself too after me have pointed out. Using Canon's DPP. PS I use it only when I have to do something "more," but I know use the 5% of its potential. Pratricamente nothing! we do not lose a lot of time even in DPP ... I move a couple of levers to give a bit of "character" and so on. Just to make it a little presentable and enjoyable. In this photo if I remember correctly, in the DPP I must have a little adrizzata (I think), a bit of saturation, light and shade (even good), some crop because with 400mm arrived there (then the composition), and finally the step in sharpening with PS to save it for the web.
I should put their heads down and learn ...
Greetings to you and thank you. : - | Si, il 1/2 dovrebbe essere quello che mi trovavo anche io dopo che me lo hai fatto notare. Uso Dpp della Canon. PS lo uso solo quando devo fare qualcosa di "più", ma lo so usare il 5% del suo potenziale. Pratricamente niente! Non ci perdo molto tempo nemmeno in Dpp... sposto un paio di leve per dare un pò di "carattere" e via. Giusto per renderla un po presentabile e godibile. In questa foto se non ricordo male, in Dpp devo averla un pò adrizzata (credo), un pò di saturazione, luci e ombre (nemmeno bene), un po di crop perchè con i 400mm non ci arrivavo (quindi composizione) e infine il passaggio in sharpening con PS per salvarla per il web.
Dovrei mettermi a testa bassa e imparare...
Un saluto anche a te e grazie. |
| sent on March 26, 2017 (16:27) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on March 27, 2017 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Werner Very kind ...: - | Molto gentile Werner... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
