RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Bird

 
Bird...

Uccelli

View gallery (6 photos)

Bird sent on March 13, 2015 (11:52) by Pakky. 4 comments, 747 views. [retina]

, 1/800 f/5.6, ISO 800, hand held.




View High Resolution 6.1 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user19955
avatar
sent on March 14, 2015 (0:17)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Con il titolo mi hai fatto veramente ridere di gusto !!! MrGreenMrGreen
Volevo farti anche i comlplimenti per questo scatto perchè, anche se non bellissimo, con una MAF così così e con il soggetto un pò incasinato dai rami, ti rende merito per l'attrezzatura usata. Il 70/300 che posseggo e che ho utilizzato per alcuni scatti di avifauna purtroppo, come il corpo, mostra in queste occasioni tutti i suoi limiti. Non demordere prima o poi uno scatto migliore ti capita, basta perseverare.
Ciao

With the title made me really laugh out loud !!! :-D:-D
I wanted you to also comlplimenti for this shot because, though not beautiful, with a MAF so-so and the subject a little messed up from the branches, makes you about the equipment used. The 70/300 I own and I used to shoot several birds unfortunately, like the body, shows on these occasions all its limitations. Do not give up sooner or later one best shot you get it, just persevere.
Hello

avatarjunior
sent on March 14, 2015 (11:08)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bene sono contento di averti fatto ridere.Sorriso
Quelli degli Uccelli sono tutti scatti dal poggiolo di casa dei miei genitori.
Ti dirò che non ho idea di che nome abbia questo volatile pertanto ho deciso per il nome comune di volatile.
Guarda in realtà della macchina sono soddisfatto perché in condizioni di luce normale lavora molto bene.
Quando invece la spingi a scatti particolari con poca luce manifesta tutti i suoi limiti. L'abbinamento con il 70/300 purtroppo non è il massimo, vengono degli scatti con una nitidezza ridicola, forse perché sono un po' impedito anch'io.
Grazie del passaggio saluti Enrico.


Well I'm glad I made you laugh. :-)
Those Birds are all shots from balcony of my parents' house.
I'll tell you that I have no idea what name this bird has therefore decided for the common name of volatile.
Look at the reality of the machine are satisfied because in normal lighting conditions works very well.
However, when the push shoty details in low light manifests all its limitations. The combination with the 70/300 unfortunately is not the best, are the shots with a sharpness ridiculous, perhaps because they are a bit 'too prevented.
Thanks for the ride greetings Henry.

user19955
avatar
sent on March 14, 2015 (11:41)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


In avifauna, per esperienza personale passando da D3100 a D7000, l'importante è la velocità con cui l'insieme corpo lente mette a fuoco e in modo preciso il soggetto. Certo però che non si può avere tutto a prezzi umani; se poi parliamo di corpi e lenti pro è un altro discorso.
Ciao

In birds, from personal experience going from D3100 to D7000, the important thing is the speed with which the whole body and lens focuses precisely the subject. Certainly, however, that you can not have everything at prices humans; if we speak of bodies and lenses pro is another matter.
Hello

avatarjunior
sent on March 14, 2015 (14:31)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Chiaro la 7000 è molto più performante ed è ovvio che se usi roba da 3000 euro le cose cambiano lo stesso scatto risulta più preciso e gradevole.
Ma si cerca di ottenere il massimo con quello che si ha.Sorriso SorrisoSorriso
Ciao

Clear the 7000 is much more powerful and it is obvious that if you use stuff from 3000 EUR things change the same shot is more accurate and pleasant.
But trying to get the most with what you have. :-):-):-)
Hello


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me