Waterfalls Pasolini

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

16.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

X-T1 View gallery (8 photos)

Waterfalls Pasolini sent on March 08, 2015 (0:09) by Adristar. 3 comments, 811 views.

at 21mm, 20 sec f/18.0, ISO 200, tripod. Roma, Italy.

View High Resolution 16.0 MP

8 persons like it: Albieri Sergio, Ciska, Dantes, Jerry Vacchieri, Maxmontella, Sg67, Valentina85, Vittorio Scatolini

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Ciska

sent on March 29, 2015 (23:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice!
Hello
Ciska 8-) wow!

Adristar

sent on March 30, 2015 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much;)

Bernacca

sent on April 10, 2015 (14:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Color horrendous ... but sometimes I run up too in these photos ... here I play a key light ... having said that the
landscape is perhaps the one that, in certain situations, suffers more work in post production ... in here
I see spectacular photos but the reality is that many machines produce histograms indecent, but then a lot of work to exceptions .... optimization of photos in optimal lighting conditions (eg. at sunset) ...
Add that the Fuji, for what I've found, do not miss a beat in the incarnate (I think they are the TOP) while
photo produce less efficient landscaping ...

To be fair, after trying Canon, Fuji, Pentax, Sony and Olympus (obviously not all models), not
I caught one that produces fotor exceptional natural ...
I wonder what sense to spend 1000 euro body, 600 of goal ... and then having to spend hours in post-production
because the files produced are a ciofeche ...:-(

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.