What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 29, 2012 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the colors and the detail in the original is awesome, I tried to take - if possible - with a longer focal length to create more separation from the background. Mi piacciono i colori e il dettaglio nell'originale è impressionante; avrei provato a scattare - se possibile - con una focale più lunga per creare una maggiore separazione dallo sfondo. |
user6267 | sent on March 29, 2012 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact right Juza ... seems to be within the almond!
Congratulations for the photo! But that reflex did you use? 42.7 MPX ... damn In effetti ha ragione Juza... sembra di essere all'interno del mandorlo!
Complimenti per la foto! Ma che reflex hai usato? 42.7 MPX...accidenti  |
| sent on March 29, 2012 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Juza, was what I had in mind, but I could not completely in my purpose. Already so are a 15in of shots made with the 85mm f / 1.6 in order to have a minimum depth of field. States with Photomerge. At full resolution it can be seen that the fire is just a blade just in front of the trunk (I focused the bulk of inflorescences). Should I try again with qualcoa different, but I fear that the 200mm f / 2,8 is worse dell'85mm f / 1.4 used closed 1/3 stop at f / 1.6 ... or not? Grazie Juza, era quello che avevo in mente, ma non sono riuscito completamente nel mio intento. Già così sono una 15ina di scatti fatti con l'85mm a f/1,6 per avere una profondità di campo minima. Uniti con Photomerge. A piena risoluzione infatti si vede che il fuoco è proprio una lama appena davanti al tronco (ho messo a fuoco il grosso delle infiorescenze). Devo riprovare con qualcoa di diverso, ma temo che il 200mm f/2,8 sia peggio dell'85mm f/1,4 utilizzato chiuso di 1/3 di stop a f/1,6...o no? |
| sent on March 29, 2012 (16:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ But that reflex did you use? 42.7 MPX Eeeek ... damn! Eeeek! Eeeek! „
8-) ... a vulgar Nikon D300s with 85mm f / 1.4, with more shots retrofitted with photomerge.
Now I update image field instrumentation:-P " Ma che reflex hai usato? 42.7 MPX...accidenti Eeeek!!!Eeeek!!!Eeeek!!! "
 ...una volgare Nikon D300s con l'85mm f/1,4, con più scatti montati successivamente con photomerge.
Ora aggiorno i campi strumentazione dell'immagine  |
| sent on March 30, 2012 (0:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Detail impressive.
The detail and color of the grass in focus are amazing! Good work! Dettaglio impressionante .
Il dettaglio e i colori dell'erba a fuoco sono stupefacenti! Ottimo lavoro! |
| sent on April 03, 2012 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gabbo_77! :-) Grazie Gabbo_77!  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
42.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
