What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 15, 2018 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excuse the stupid question ... how did you take a picture with this lens (50 f / 1.9) to 1/50 f / 1.4 ???
Anyway, I really like the photo Scusa la domanda stupida...come hai fatto a fare una foto con questo obiettivo (50 f/1.9) a 1/50 f/1.4???
Cmq la foto mi piace molto |
| sent on January 15, 2018 (11:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Juza transmits data automatically, and being a vintage optic with an adapter ring CY / canon EF enabled to f. 1.4 has set that as a data - pity that the real opening is not indicated on the exif fates and I have no clear idea of ??the f. used, although I probably slightly closed the diaphragm, given the mediocre quality of the lens in question! - in the notes I indicated f.1.9 right x not to create confusion to the viewer of the shooting data Juza trasmette i dati in automatico, ed essendo un'ottica vintage con anello adattatore CY/canon EF abilitato alla f. 1.4 ha impostato quello come dato - peccato che l'apertura reale non venga indicata sui fati exif e non ho idea precisa della f. utilizzata, anche se probabilmente ho leggermente chiuso il diaframma, vista la mediocre qualità dell'ottica in questione! - nelle note ho indicato f.1.9 giusto x non creare confusione a chi guarda i dati di scatto |
| sent on January 15, 2018 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Juza transmits data automatically, and being a vintage optic with an adapter ring CY / canon EF enabled to f. 1.4 has set that as a data - pity that the real opening is not indicated on the exif fates and I have no clear idea of ??the f. used, although I probably slightly closed the diaphragm, given the mediocre quality of the lens in question! - in the notes I indicated f.1.9 right x not to create confusion to who looks at the shooting data „
Now you have been very clear .. also because it is OK that the ML of Yashica are excellent lenses .. but at 1.9 so clear and so PDC seemed strange to me: D
Anyway beautiful. " Juza trasmette i dati in automatico, ed essendo un'ottica vintage con anello adattatore CY/canon EF abilitato alla f. 1.4 ha impostato quello come dato - peccato che l'apertura reale non venga indicata sui fati exif e non ho idea precisa della f. utilizzata, anche se probabilmente ho leggermente chiuso il diaframma, vista la mediocre qualità dell'ottica in questione! - nelle note ho indicato f.1.9 giusto x non creare confusione a chi guarda i dati di scatto "
Ora sei stato chiarissimo..anche perché ok che le ML della Yashica siano ottime lenti..ma a 1.9 così nitido e così PDC mi sembrava strano :D
Cmq bellissima. |
| sent on January 15, 2018 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Davide! - honestly this is one of the few shots in which this lens gave me satisfactory results, but the version f. 1.7 (if I'm not mistaken), it seems to be definitely better - I also have a 24 vivitar and 28 kiron (C / Y), which I use with greater satisfaction Grazie Davide! - onestamente questo e' uno dei pochi scatti in cui questa lente mi ha dato risultati soddisfacenti, ma la versione f. 1.7 ( se non sbaglio), pare sia decisamente migliore - ho anche un 24 vivitar e 28 kiron ( C/Y), che uso con maggior soddisfazione |
| sent on January 15, 2018 (16:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Thanks Davide! - honestly this is one of the few shots in which this lens gave me satisfactory results, but the version f. 1.7 (if I'm not mistaken), it seems to be definitely better - I also have a 24 vivitar and 28 kiron (C / Y), which I use with greater satisfaction „
Sorry I misunderstood ... yes 1.7 would seem better.
However, the ML series all speak very well (and in fact they are very beautiful as glasses).
" Grazie Davide! - onestamente questo e' uno dei pochi scatti in cui questa lente mi ha dato risultati soddisfacenti, ma la versione f. 1.7 ( se non sbaglio), pare sia decisamente migliore - ho anche un 24 vivitar e 28 kiron ( C/Y), che uso con maggior soddisfazione"
Scusa avevo capito male...si l'1.7 sembrerebbe migliore.
Comunque della serie ML ne parlano tutti molto bene (Ed in effetti sono molto belli come vetri).
|
| sent on January 16, 2018 (0:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you want to waste some time, one of my last photos posted (the roses at Villa Durazzo), come out of the vivitar 24 f. 2.8 C / Y ... not bad and even the booken personally I do not mind (this, and you can see it at TA f 2.8 - obviously not 1.4 as indicated automatically Se vuoi perdere un po di tempo, una delle mie ultime foto postate ( le rose a villa Durazzo), escono dal vivitar 24 f. 2.8 C/Y... non se la cava male e anche il booken personalmente non mi dispiace ( questo, e si vede e' a TA f. 2.8 - ovviamente non 1.4 come indicato in automatico |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
