What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 14, 2015 (1:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations, it's so beautiful! wow! wow! Complimenti, è bellissima così! |
| sent on February 14, 2015 (8:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a beautiful, really excellent work. Hello Che bella, davvero eccellente lavoro. Ciao |
| sent on February 14, 2015 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular !! .... so much stuff! ... One of the best I've seen so far! Good Gp Spettacolare!!....tanta tanta roba!...una delle migliori che ho visto fino ad ora! Bravo Gp |
| sent on February 14, 2015 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all:-) It is true this processing makes it much better is the comet that the environment all around Marzio:-D Grazie a tutti Si è vero questa elaborazione rende molto meglio sia la cometa che il contesto tutto intorno Marzio |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations, very beautiful. If I can do a little criticism, likely to contain noise you avoided to make the background sky darker. The final image, however, seems a bit 'too washed out. Excuse the ignorance, but the central ds should not already contain a great deal of its noise?
I am very undecided whether to buy a 60D ds too, or buy a used 5d2 apply ourselves the Baader filter and hold it so the astrografia. Complimenti, molto bella. Se posso fare una piccola critica, probabilmente per contenere il rumore hai evitato di rendere il fondo cielo più scuro. L'immagine finale però appare un po' troppo slavata. Scusa l'ignoranza, ma la central ds non dovrebbe già di suo contenere moltissimo il rumore? Sono molto indeciso se acquistarne una 60D ds anche io, oppure acquistare una 5d2 usata applicarci il filtro baader e tenerla così per l'astrografia. |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (10:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful ... one of the most 'beautiful I have seen so far. bellissima...una delle piu' belle che abbia visto fino ad ora. |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great job with the stars with the perfect colors !! Marzio great !! Ottimo lavoro, con le stelle con i colori perfetti!! Grande Marzio!! |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (12:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x Febercom: I've never personally done comparisons between 60d CentralDs and a 5d2 modified but not cooled. What I can tell you is that the noise that feedback on CentralDs is very much lower than that found on machines not cooled. Your observation about the noise of this image you have to mediate with the few pictures made for this: 8 shots. They are really few, very few indeed, normally I try to incorporate at least 1 hour time and allowing the subject, but I can tell you that if you go to two or three hours is very much better. I purposely kept the clear sky to enhance the struttutra tail and the whole area around very rich. My impression is that if I lower the light of heaven does not get up the evidence of the noise, but I lower. In any casop if therempre space to improve. Thank You Hello There;-) x Febercom: Non ho mai fatto personalmente confronti fra 60d CentralDs e una 5d2 modificata ma non raffreddata. Quello che posso dirti è che il rumore che riscontro sulla CentralDs è molto molto inferiore a quanto riscontrato su macchine non raffreddate. La tua osservazione sul rumore di questa foto la devi mediare con le poche foto fatte per questa immagine: 8 scatti. Sono veramente pochini, anzi pochissimi, normalmente cerco di integrare almeno 1 ora tempo e oggetto permettendo, ma posso dirti che se vai a 2 o 3 ore è molto molto meglio. Ho tenuto appositamente il cielo chiaro per esaltare la struttutra della coda e tutta la zona intorno molto ricca. La mia impressione è che se abbasso la luce del cielo non alzo l'evidenza del rumore, ma la abbasso. In ogni casop c'è sempre spazio a migliorarsi. Grazie Ciao |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x Vittorio and Skender: Thank You !!!!! Hello, Marzio:-D x Vittorio e Skender: Grazie!!!!! Ciao, Marzio |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
x Febercom: Sorry Fabrizio but before I went racing .... I was finishing cooking the cuttlefish Catalan !!! And think of a 5d2 cooled? 8-) Hello x Febercom: Scusa Fabrizio ma prima andavo di corsa.... stavo finendo di cuocere le seppie alla catalana !!! E pensare a una 5d2 raffreddata? Ciao |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow fantastic wow fantastica |
| sent on February 15, 2015 (22:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank Gian Maria:-) Ti ringrazio Gian Maria |
| sent on June 04, 2016 (14:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Juliet thanks :-D Hello Grazie Giulietta Ciao |
| sent on January 09, 2023 (0:52) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on January 09, 2023 (13:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Garibuja Grazie Garibuja |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |