Monaco Burmese | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Travel Reportage

Resize to fit window

ritratti View gallery (3 photos)

Monaco Burmese sent on February 11, 2015 (16:32) by Cecco80. 20 comments, 999 views.

, 1/40 f/3.5, ISO 200, hand held.

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Cecco80

sent on February 11, 2015 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello everyone ...
Comments and criticism always welcome

Francescomirra

sent on February 12, 2015 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello to me on the whole picture like a lot. Pp I do not understand very well yet but the face I would have done slightly lighter (but are personal tastes, certainly not errors), I adjusted a bit 'the sky that shines through the leaves that is burned and I distributed a slightly bit 'the right soggetto..ma these, again, are just personal taste:-D for the rest I really like the colors, especially the wood and sand ... overall a great photograph:-P I'm just a neophyte then not take at face value what I say, but consult people more qualified than me:-)

Tifotetano

sent on February 13, 2015 (5:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Cecco, the photo is beautiful but I also see sth halo around the subject that is perhaps a result of the PP? I also would have decentralized and given a aggiustatina to the sky in the upper left. PS I am also a beginner so do not give too much weight to my comment.
Hello, Stephen.

Cecco80

sent on February 13, 2015 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok for the sky ... Cropping in a bit to remove it ....
But I explained the reason for having distributed the Subject? Just to understand ...
because for me it is balanced as it is ......;-)
Thanks Hello Cecco

Francescomirra

sent on February 13, 2015 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I went only to the eye, so probably it is I who am wrong:-D simply because I would follow more the rule of thirds putting the proper subject of a long vertical lines ... but just a hair, nothing you più..ma I repeat, you're probably right because you are just a taste:-P still great photos in the complex! congratulations !!

Cecco80

sent on February 13, 2015 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Mine was only a question since you both have said that you would put the subject moved more .... So I wanted to understand why this advice ... If there was a particular reason, or if it was just the fact of following the rule the third ...
Anyway thanks for the ride and for the suggestion that I appreciated ..

Francescomirra

sent on February 13, 2015 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you, at least I was referring only to that because I think that the rest is balanced very well!

Tifotetano

sent on February 14, 2015 (7:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, for me (of course subjective and debatable) decentralizing slightly DX would have enhanced the foreground: sogg and trunk and left visual space to the background. In this case, the trunk which is practically on the same plane of sogg "disturbs" the scene slightly. Bringing them do not have to look away from the center to the edge of the picture and the two parties would give strength to snap together. Blowjobs type tree and wisdom etc. PS is a photo of a very pleasant and I would write with the ultimate goal of observe, memorize and learn.
See you soon, Stefano.

Cecco80

sent on February 14, 2015 (8:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Stephen for your opinion ....
I deliberately included the tree for two reasons .. one because I liked how the colors and the other to understand the time to relax ...
In my moving to the right person, the left part of the picture would be a bit 'empty ......
Anyway thanks passage

Claudio Santoro

sent on February 23, 2015 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful and nicely contextualized. Good

Cecco80

sent on February 25, 2015 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you so much of the passage

Dario Gazzi

sent on February 27, 2015 (15:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In terms of composition according to me is just fine, decentralizing you lose important elements for the context.
As I had already said I would try to squeeze a nap because the sky that is visible through the trees is a bit ugly and lose the photos that I think is very nice.

However worry ... you're like me everywhere! :-D:-D:-D

Cecco80

sent on February 27, 2015 (15:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Dario ...
Already made the cutout to the sky in order to exclude the bad part .........

We are worse parsley:-)
:-):-)

Nino 58

sent on February 27, 2015 (18:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

wow what a beautiful bravowow!

Alessandro Bergamini

sent on February 27, 2015 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I would have approached more, got up a little point shooting to exclude the sky from the scene .. an interesting photo, which would become a beautiful portrait with some changes in more ..
attention to the post, there are a little halos especially evident on the dress ..
all obviously very personal considerations that may deviate with your personal taste!

Cecco80

sent on February 27, 2015 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the ride marangiantonio

Cecco80

sent on February 27, 2015 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks alebergamini.
Usually portraits prefer them at eye level of the subject, the part of the sky I have the version where I settled excluding it from the scene, and actually earns ...
Thanks for the advice ..
Ps As for the post ... My mistake, because I had the monitor calibrated to ca..o ... ????

Daniele Quaranta

sent on March 04, 2015 (16:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find it very beautiful for the colors, maybe I cut a little bit 'more to SX and DX to concentrate everything on the subject, but I find it very pleasant even so!
Greetings
Daniele;-)

Cecco80

sent on March 09, 2015 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Many thanks Daniel for advice and for the passage ....

Claudio Cozzani

sent on June 21, 2015 (9:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like a lot, it is true the rule of thirds is a guide to the composition, but this pdr and composition are beautiful, good lights and colors, hello ;-)

Claudio C

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.