JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 22, 2012 (22:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice idea and light, but not convinced at all the cut of the veil and the presence of two photographers who disturb a little. ' hello bella idea e luce, ma non convince del tutto il taglio del velo e la presenza dei due fotografi che disturbano un po'. ciao
sent on March 26, 2012 (23:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with gian the excessive contrast aggiunmgerei, better vivare this yellow too present concordo con gian anche l'eccessivo contrasto aggiunmgerei, meglio vivare questo giallo troppo presente
sent on April 02, 2012 (15:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello! thank you both for the comments.
“ best vivare this yellow this too „
unfortunately the yellow I must confess that from my monitor is little known. Instead I happened to see the picture from another PC (with larger screen plus - I use a 14'') and see that in fact there is a very marked preponderance.
“ not convinced at all the cut of the film and the presence of two photographers who disturb a little ' „
The two photographers were ubiquitous (they were the official ones ...) throughout the church there were 5 or 6 and it was virtually impossible to take a picture without including (a sort of "watermark on the" by them). To cut the veil instead I did it on purpose, mostly because I did not want "center" too spouses in the frame, but this and other defects are correct that I have (in another photo of another wedding I cut the bouquet :-|: -|) ciao! grazie ad entrambi per i commenti.
" meglio vivare questo giallo troppo presente " purtroppo sul giallo devo confessare che dal mio monitor si nota poco. Mi è invece capitato di visualizzare la foto da un'altro PC (con schermo più grande oltretutto - io uso un 14'') e vedere che in effetti c'è una preponderanza molto marcata.
" non convince del tutto il taglio del velo e la presenza dei due fotografi che disturbano un po'" I due fotografi erano omnipresenti (erano quelli ufficiali...) in tutta la chiesa ce ne stavano 5 o 6 ed era praticamente impossibile fare una foto senza includerli (una sorta di "watermark sull'evento" da parte loro ). Per il taglio del velo invece l'ho fatto di proposito, più che altro perchè non volevo "centrare" troppo gli sposi nel fotogramma, ma questo come altri sono difetti che devo correggere (in un'altra foto di un altro matrimonio ho tagliato il bouquet)
sent on May 19, 2014 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, personamente I really like the colors, too bad for photographers who would like cloned with the wall ...... the only thing I do not like concerning the slope .. I think in general it's a nice photo. good light. Vince ciao, personamente mi piacciono molto i colori, peccato per i fotografi che vorrebbero clonati con la parete ...... l'unica cosa che non mi piace riguarda la pendenza.. Credo in generale sia una foto piacevole. buona luce. Vince