RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
waterlilies...

MERRILL

View gallery (3 photos)

waterlilies sent on February 02, 2015 (13:36) by Sabbiavincent. 10 comments, 1852 views.

f/2.8, ISO 100, hand held.






What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on February 05, 2017 (2:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It looks like a real photo and not a digital reproduction ... a rightness and a natural model. :-)

avatarsenior
sent on February 06, 2017 (9:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Magic of the Foveon Merrill sensor, dear Leo. And was taken with a compact camera aps-c, the original is even more beautiful. :-)

avatarsenior
sent on February 08, 2017 (17:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Uses Sigma Photo Pro? ... I think is the only one to open the raw Foveon

avatarsenior
sent on February 08, 2017 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes SPP, is the best for the Foveon

user92328
avatar
sent on April 27, 2017 (16:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wonderful..!!! :-) Congratulations Sand .. ;-)
aLeoo we make Let us take a Sigma ... ?? I am sooooo tempted .... or take this or a7 sony ... but the Sigma returns details and three dimensionality really of great value that I can not find in any other brand ..

Sand, but that PP requires a photo so ..? Light or any other files .. a good car?
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on April 27, 2017 (17:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This has not been done almost post-production, it's just SPP. As you teach well and find the right wb comes out something incredible.
But it is not all-weather, the A7 is more flexible.

user92328
avatar
sent on April 28, 2017 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It will not be for all seasons as you say, but I have seen photos with details never seen in other photos ...
But it is true that the serie merrill is absolutely the best, while the other versions have a minor detail ..?
A nice last model with interchangeable optics like SD Quattro I would love a lot ...
However, the great detail you see in the photos seems to me that something like this can be done with some pS techniques that increase the detail, though, i have to admit that the sigma file and nice clean mind that with pS you have to stand Watch out otherwise it gets too much noise ......
However, the fact remains that I find the sigma quality very interesting, while the FF of Sony, Canon and Nikon are a bit softer in detail so less dimensional ......

avatarsenior
sent on April 28, 2017 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The type of blur that generates a foveon is unique; Bigmpixels are superior to how much detail, but at the same resolution there is no story.
The colors I always say are unmanageable for professional jobs.
Maybe if my project goes to port, I'll take a sdqh with 12-24 art and 85 1.4 art. Then it will be fun. But I will use it only for bn.

user92328
avatar
sent on April 28, 2017 (23:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wow sand, I tell you frankly, the SDQH does not convince me, at least from the photos I saw... The SDQH was the only model that I still had not seen because the 44 Mp are too many for my taste...
The series DP1-2-3 I like and the series Merrill more.....

avatarsenior
sent on April 28, 2017 (23:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like a lot, compliments

Claudio c


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me