What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 02, 2015 (13:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great scenery.
From reviewing the focus (the horizon does not seem to fire) Ottimo paesaggio.
Da rivedere la messa a fuoco (l'orizzonte non mi pare a fuoco) |
| sent on May 02, 2015 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I could actually close the diaphragm more, type f. 22 but I preferred to use a diaphragm that I knew great result for the optical (maf is on the first floor), but honestly I love it so.
thanks anyway your judgment and pass ;-) potevo in effetti chiudere il diaframma di più, tipo a f. 22 ma ho preferito usare un diaframma che sapevo di gran risultato per l'ottica (la maf è sul primo piano), ma sinceramente mi piace così.
grazie comunque del tuo giudizio e passaggio  |
| sent on May 02, 2015 (13:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So much more than closing the diaphragm (which causes other problems), I would have moved the focus directly.
Assuming you had zoomed to 30mm and had opened the aperture to 1/16, if put yourself on fire about 2 meters away you had to fire from about 1 meter to infinity
Or 28 mm in F 1/11, focus 2.4 meters had from 1.20 to infinity Più che chiudere così tanto il diaframma (che poi causa altri problemi), avrei spostato la messa a fuoco direttamente.
Ammettendo che avevi zoomato a 30mm e avevi aperto il diaframma a 1/16, se mettevi a fuoco a circa 2 metri di distanza avevi a fuoco da circa 1 metro a infinito
Oppure a 28 mm a F 1/11, messa a fuoco a 2,4 metri avevi da 1,20 fino a infinito |
| sent on May 02, 2015 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
already, it's just as you say; I would say it's called system dell'iperfocale and I had used when I was zooming previous to this where I was delighted to try using the scale of distances in the window on the barrel.
This time, as I said, I did not just give a pdc so wide.
see you next time. già, è proprio come dici tu; direi si chiami sistema dell'iperfocale e l'avevo usato quando avevo lo zoom precedente a questo in cui mi ero dilettato a provarlo usando la scala di distanze nella finestrella sul barilotto.
Stavolta, come ti dicevo, non volevo proprio dare un pdc così ampia.
alla prossima. |
| sent on March 24, 2020 (22:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot. Effective framing and focus that I don't mind at all. Hello. Ottimo scatto. Efficace l'inquadratura e la messa a fuoco che a me non dispiace affatto. Ciao. |
| sent on March 24, 2020 (23:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it really beautiful
complis La trovo veramente bella
complimenti |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
