What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user16612 | sent on January 29, 2015 (8:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 's true, there's noise, however, is well pursued and very deep;-) E' vero, c'è del rumore, però è ben inseguita e molto profonda  |
| sent on January 29, 2015 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice clip we see good m42, and a veil of horse head, I was not able to highlight it but I'm trying these days weather permitting Bello scatto si vede bene m42, e un velo della testa di cavallo, io non sono riuscito a evidenziarla ma sto provando in questi giorni tempo permettendo |
| sent on January 30, 2015 (7:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank You;)
Grazie ;)
|
| sent on February 01, 2015 (8:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bravo, and 'coming good. I also use Nikon, but to do astrophotography, even of large fields, you have to use canon, which you can change by replacing the normal filter ir-cut with a specific Baader that lets lengths d 'light wave of nebulae (H alpha) .Hello There Bravo, e' venuta bene. Anche io uso Nikon, ma per fare astrofotografia, anche di campi larghi, bisogna usare canon, che puoi modificare sostituendo il normale filtro ir-cut con uno specifico di baader che lascia passare le lunghezze d' onda della luce delle nebulose (H alfa).Ciao |
| sent on February 01, 2015 (9:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lucapucci through the passage, also I have read and straletto monologues about why you use canon and nikon .... first of all the noise correction implemented by Nikon in its raw despite being off the option (but tiny in astrophoto a certain level counts!) ..... for the filter, even on nikon I saw that you delete the filter placed in front of the sensor ... but since canon dominates in this field is hard to find those who do it on nikon ..... it is necessary to the home made .... but to put hands "intimacy" of my D3000 do not think so ..... I would come out two camera bodies:-D Ciao Lucapucci grazie del passaggio, anche io ho letto e straletto monologhi sul perchè si usa canon e non nikon....prima di tutto la correzione del rumore messa in atto da nikon nei suoi raw nonostante sia disattivata l'opzione (piccola piccola ma in astrofoto di un certo livello conta!).....per il filtro, anche su nikon ho visto che viene eliminato il filtro posto davanti al sensore...ma visto che canon spadroneggia in questo campo è difficile trovare chi lo fa su nikon.....si rende necessario l'home made....ma di mettere mani "nell'intimo" della mia d3000 non ci penso proprio.....credo ne uscirebbero due corpi macchina  |
| sent on February 01, 2015 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree, and 'better not to do a similar job by yourself ... If I could find someone who does to Nikon, the change of filter I mean, I would do it. Okay if anyone knows who can 'do, say it. Hello Sono d'accordo, e' meglio non farlo un lavoro simile da soli...Io se trovassi qualcuno che lo fa per Nikon, il cambio di filtro intendo, lo farei subito. Va be se qualcuno sa chi lo puo' fare, lo dica. Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
9.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
