JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 16, 2012 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
com a bit 'risky (I do not know whether it is intentional) and hard light that is missing right in the "heart": a subject on which you can work more ... ;-) compo un po' azzardata (non so se sia voluta) e luce dura che viene a mancare proprio al "cuore": un tema su cui si può lavorare ancora ...
sent on March 16, 2012 (19:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.. Add .. I tried a vertical cut, clean the sensor or with the Clone Stamp of cs, f 22 is too .. xò not ask me how the masters do to have everything in focus with an f 2.8 hello is good ..aggiungo..avrei provato un taglio verticale,pulito il sensore o con il timbro clone del cs,f 22 è troppo..xò non chiedermi come fanno i maestri ad avere tutto a fuoco con un f 2.8 ciao è bravo
sent on March 16, 2012 (21:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello I'm looking at the picture on laptop (1980x1020) and on-screen 24 "full hd. I do not see a point of focus ... generally seems unclear, perhaps simply shake or smarten f22. Personally I would not cut in this way but it is a matter of taste. greetings Joseph Ciao sto guardando la foto su portatile (1980x1020) e su schermo 24" full hd. Non vedo un punto di messa a fuoco... sembra genericamente poco nitida, forse micromosso o pìù semplicemente f22. Personalmente non avrei tagliato in questo modo ma è questione di gusti. saluti Giuseppe
sent on March 16, 2012 (21:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all for the ride. In fact, this is the first evidence for this theme, the lack of sharpness is certainly due to the focal trying a wider area of ??focus, but the result was the opposite. For the composition I must say that is desired, even though I thought it vertically, but this seems more special. Grazie a tutti per il passaggio. In effetti questa è la prima prova per questo tema, la scarsa nitidezza sicuramente è dovuta alla focale: cercavo una più ampia zona di messa a fuoco, ma il risultato è stato opposto. Per la composizione devo dire che è voluta, anche se avevo pensato di farla in verticale, ma questa mi sembra più particolare.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
