What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 03, 2015 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How nice this shot. Soft profiles and the colors of the sunset, a photo "relaxing". Superb also stray light from behind the tree and the management of its backlight. A curiosity: ISO 200 you have them adjusted or you gave them to the machine with ISO-AUTO? I was thinking of always being fixed at ISO 200 (if not use ISO car) because it retrieves a stop and the difference between 100 and 200 practically can not see either. What do you think about it? Thank you, bye!! / Mirko. Che bello questo scatto. Morbidi i profili e i colori del tramonto, una foto "rilassante". Stupendo anche la luce diffusa da dietro l'albero e la gestione del relativo controluce. Una curiosità: 200 iso li hai regolati tu o te li ha dati la macchina con ISO-AUTO? Stavo pensando di stare sempre fisso a 200 iso (se non uso ISO auto) perchè si recupera uno stop e la differenza tra 100 e 200 praticamente non si vede neanche. Che ne pensi? Grazie, ciao!! /Mirko. |
| sent on November 04, 2015 (13:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
mirko thanks! I'll tell you, I should update my gallery because in reality there are few old photos and even the best ... I never have time, I follow in Juza assiduously but silent ... I do not use iso-car, I tried but not I like the concept, I prefer to choose a value and change it if necessary, with the logic of the rollers of the past. among other things as a home base I always choose or 200 or 400 and I feel good. when I step in low light directly to 800 and then to 1600. Stop! then yes, I agree with you. grazie mirko! ti dirò, dovrei aggiornare la mia galleria perchè in realtà ci sono poche foto vecchie e neppure le migliori... non ho mai tempo, seguo juza in assiduamente ma in silenzio... io non uso iso-auto, ci ho provato ma non mi piace come concetto, preferisco scegliere un valore e modificarlo solo se necessario, con la logica dei rullini di un tempo. tra l'altro come base di partenza scelgo sempre o 200 o 400 e mi trovo bene. quando ho poca luce passo direttamente a 800 e poi a 1600. stop! quindi si, sono d'accordo con te. |
| sent on November 04, 2015 (18:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the confirmation. Nanche I love self-iso. prefersico I manage. I remember the old D40 is started from 200 ISO and the photos were always beautiful. Sure it was a small sensor (6MP) but if I must tell the truth, for me that sensor there, CCD, was fantastic. I could not swear to crop but not buttavi never clicks. Hello, Mirko. Grazie mille per la conferma. Nanche io adoro auto-iso. prefersico gestire io. Ricordo che con la vecchia D40 si partiva da 200 iso e le foto risultavano sempre bellissime. Certo era un sensore piccolo (6MP) ma se debbo dire la verità, per me quel sensore li, CCD, era fantastico. Non potevi croppare ma giuro: non buttavi mai uno scatto. Ciao, Mirko. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |