What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 18, 2014 (19:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This I like best;-) questa mi piace di più |
| sent on December 18, 2014 (20:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And to think that I had scartar. Thanks very kind as always! E pensare che l'avevo scartar. Grazie gentilissimo come sempre! |
| sent on December 18, 2014 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, a question, I have made a similar myself and how I came into your bokeh not round but with the effect rugby ball .. Why? It depends on the flashing lights? Ciao, una domanda, ne ho fatto una simile anche io e come nella tua mi è venuto il bokeh non tondo ma con l'effetto pallone da rugby.. Come mai? Dipende dalle luci intermittenti? |
| sent on December 18, 2014 (22:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For what purpose? A value that f you were? I've done this at full aperture with the canon 50mm 1.2, then 1.2 af, so wide open the aperture blades are all open and not seen then the result of the bokeh is given by the optical scheme only. If I had closed the aperture bokeh would assume a more rounded shape (also according to the number of lamellae optics) because it would be "seen" the diaphragm, I hope you get the idea:-D. So to answer more easily, is correct because it is so wide open. Con quale obiettivo? A che valore f stavi? Io questa l'ho eseguita a tutta apertura con il 50mm canon 1.2, quindi a f 1.2, così a tutta apertura le lamelle del diaframma sono tutte aperte e non si vedono quindi il risultato del bokeh é dato dallo schema ottico solamente. Se invece avessi chiuso il diaframma il bokeh avrebbe assunto una forma più tondeggiante (in base anche al n° di lamelle dell'ottica) perché si sarebbe "visto" il diaframma, spero di aver reso l'idea . Quindi per rispondere in modo più semplice, é corretto così perché é a tutta apertura. |
| sent on December 19, 2014 (9:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok thanks in fact I was a TA with a 50mm 1.8 ok grazie in effetti ero a TA con un 50mm 1.8 |
| sent on December 19, 2014 (9:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then you're in place, try to do it again turning a bit and you'll see the difference;-) Allora sei a posto, prova a rifarla chiudendo un po e vedrai la differenza |
| sent on December 19, 2014 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Grazie |
| sent on December 19, 2014 (10:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-) Thanks to you if you are not affected by season's greetings grazie a te se non ci si risente Auguri di buone Feste |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |