RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
    2. »
  2. Birds
    3. » codibugnolo

 
codibugnolo...

uccelli

View gallery (21 photos)

codibugnolo sent on December 08, 2014 (9:36) by Topolino. 4 comments, 438 views.

Nikon Coolpix P520,
Nikon Coolpix P520
1/400 f/5.9, ISO 400, Specie: Aegithalos caudatus






What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.



avatarmoderator
sent on December 08, 2014 (15:34)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Puoi Topolino fornirci sempre i dati tecnici di scatto a fianco del titolo come reflex,obiettivo, tempo esp.,num.F., programma di scatto, iso, focale, val.di deviazione esposizione, flash e se hai dovuto ricorrere a complesse modifiche in post-produzione? Fornire questi elementi utili agli altri utenti permette loro di entrare meglio nello spirito della fotografia postata e comprendere le tue scelte nella fase del pre-scatto oltre a permetterci di fare un commento più ragionato e oggettivo.;-)
La perdita di qualità è evidente , vorrei quindi capire assieme a te del perchè e come si può contrastarla Cool
ciao, lauro

Mickey can always provide the technical shooting alongside the title as a reflex, goal, time esp., Num.F., Program, shutter, ISO, focal, val.di deviation exposure, flash and if you have to resort to complex changes in post-production? Provide these items useful to others allows them to enter into the spirit of the photo posted better and understand your choices in the stage of pre-snap well as allow us to make a comment more reasoned and objective. ;-)
The loss of quality is evident, then I would understand with you why and how you can counter it 8-)
hello, laurel

avatarjunior
sent on December 09, 2014 (19:08)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


hai perfettamente ragione, ma non posso fornirvi i dati richiesti perchè non sono ancora in grado: ho dodici anni e mi hanno appena regalato una nikon coolpix p520, mi sono appena appassionato agli uccelli e alla fotografia, mi dispiace ma dovrai aspettare qualche anno prima che io possa fornirvi i dati specifici!Sorriso;-)

you're absolutely right, but I can not provide the requested data because they are not yet able: I'm twelve years old and I have just got a nikon coolpix p520, I just passionate about birds and photography, I'm sorry but you will have to wait a few years before I can provide you with specific data! :-);-)

avatarmoderator
sent on December 09, 2014 (21:18)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Se le mie informazioni sono corrette Topolino hai usato questi parametri :
-focale 180mm
-diafamma f.5,9
-tempo di scatto 1/400secondi
-iso 400

Per controllare questi dati, potresti chiedere ad un familiare adulto.

Se vuoi ottenere più qualità ti consiglio di:
-escludere per sempre lo Zoom digitale
-scegliere la focale giuste che ti permette di avvicicinare il soggetto senza tagliarlo.
La tua macchina fotografica abbraccia queste focali : 24-1000 mm
Con 24mm allarghi il campo inquadrato e salendo di valore arrivi fino a 1000mm per ingrandire i soggetti.
-per avere il soggetto più nitido imposta la macchina su AF a inseguimento
-cerca di usare spesso 400iso come hai fatto in questa occasione
-non tagliare con il tuo programma di foto-ritocco l'immagine .. più tagli e più perdi in qualità

Qui hai fotografato a soli 180mm e poi hai tagliato tanto quando hai preparato la foto. La prossima volta avvicina invece il soggetto a te usando la levetta dello zoom e fermati prima che il soggetto venga tagliato quindi a 600mm -800mm etc. . In poche parole prepara meglio lo scatto ;-) - Se l'animale risulta nitido ma non gigante come questo codibugnolo lascialo pure ambientato .
Fatti aiutare da un adulto a casa facendogli leggere questo mio intervento.

Queste immagini ti mostrano che se tagli ai lati di un soggetto come per ingrandirlo , più tagli più perdi in qualità ;)

foto originale




crop 28% (soft crop)




crop 41% (ModerateCrop)




crop 57% (HighCrop)




crop 74% (HighCrop)





ciao, lauro





If my information is correct Mickey you used these parameters:
-focale 180mm
-diafamma f.5,9
-time shutter 1 / 400secondi
-iso 400

To check this, you may ask an adult family member.

If you want to get more quality you should:
-escludere forever Digital zoom
-Choose the right focal letting you avvicicinare the subject without cutting it.
Your camera embraces these focal: 24-1000 mm
With 24mm widen the field of view and rising value of arrivals up to 1000mm to enlarge objects.
-to have the subject sharper sets the machine to AF tracking
-Try to use thick400iso or how you did on this occasion
-not cut with your program of photo-retouching the image .. more cuts and more you lose in quality

Here you have photographed just 180mm and then you cut so much when you prepared the photo. Next time, instead approaching the subject to you using the zoom lever and stop before the subject is then cut to 600mm -800mm etc. . Simply put better prepares the shot;-) - If the animal looks sharp but not like this giant codibugnolo leave him set.
Get help from an adult at home but read my speech.

These images show you that if you cut the sides of a subject as to maximize it, the more you lose more cuts in quality;)

original photo




crop 28% (soft crop)




crop 41% (ModerateCrop)




crop 57% (High Crop)




crop 74% (High Crop)





hello, laurel




avatarjunior
sent on December 10, 2014 (14:09)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


grazie davvero cercherò di seguire i tuoi consigli


thank you very much I will try to follow your advice


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me