What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user24517 | sent on November 14, 2014 (7:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |
| sent on November 14, 2014 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks !!! Grazie!!! |
| sent on November 15, 2014 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very, very nice !!!
Well done.
Mark. Molto, molto bella!!!
Complimenti.
Marco. |
user55947 | sent on November 17, 2014 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. I think it's a very nice photo from the aspect of the construction stage with the tree that seems to act as a theatrical backdrop .... ... and the light that radiates well in the photo. A highly appealing. Ciao. Penso che sia una foto molto gradevole sotto l'aspetto della costruzione scenica con l'albero che sembra fungere da quinta teatrale....e la luce...che si irradia ottimamente nell'area fotografica. Colori molto accattivanti. |
| sent on November 20, 2014 (7:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks! Grazie! |
| sent on November 21, 2014 (15:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry, I'll stop if you want to comment.
However, it is unclear, both foreground and background according to plan, I struggle to understand where you are focused.
There is so much mess in the composition between the subject and background, with low walls, other trees ... at best it is a photo. Mi spiace, se vuoi smetto di commentare.
Comunque è poco nitida, sia primo piano che secondo piano che sfondo, fatico a capire dove hai messo a fuoco.
C'è molto casino nella composizione, tra soggetto e sfondo, con muretti, altri alberi ... tutt'al più è una foto ricordo. |
| sent on November 21, 2014 (15:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The focus was part of the tree where the arc is kind sipario.dovevo delete everything and leave only tree and lawn? La messa a fuoco era parte di albero dove fa l'arco tipo sipario.dovevo eliminare tutto e lasciare solo albero e prato? |
| sent on November 21, 2014 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But .... how would delete the rest ???? This is an urban park ...... Ma....come eliminavo il resto???? Questo é un parco urbano...... |
| sent on November 21, 2014 (15:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The lack of clarity can be given by the lack of a tripod? La scarsa nitidezza puó essere data dalla mancanza di treppiede? |
| sent on November 23, 2014 (18:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To me it does not seem so blurry;-)
However there is the sharpness and blur:
sharpness is given by the focus
blur is given as "shake hands":-) There are some safety rules for the blur
zoom you multiply it by the factor crop machine (your should be 1.6) and get the safety time to prevent blur
A 1.6 mm x = 1 / sec B where A is the zoom and B is the time
the time must be less than, equal of safety time.
If you want a longer time would be better to support the camera or better to take a tripod. But I do not think in this photo he'd need.
I hope to esnight was clear A me non sembra tanto sfocata 
Comunque esiste la nitidezza e il mosso:
nitidezza è data dalla messa a fuoco
il mosso è dato quanto "tremano le mani"  Ci sono delle regole di sicurezza per il mosso
lo zoom che hai lo moltiplichi per il fattore crop della macchina (la tua dovrebbe essere 1.6) e ottieni il tempo di sicurezza per evitare il mosso
A mm x 1.6 = 1/B sec dove A è lo zoom e B è il tempo
il tempo deve essere minore uguale del tempo di sicurezza.
Se vuoi avere un tempo maggiore sarebbe meglio appoggiare la macchina fotografica o meglio prendere un treppiede. Ma non penso che in questa foto ne avresti avuto bisogno.
Spero di essere stato chiaro |
| sent on November 23, 2014 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you've been clear! The tripod I bought it about a week ago and now I do some shots with the same. Here I had not in fact si sei stato chiaro! Il treppiede l'ho acquistato circa una settimana fa e adesso qualche scatto lo faccio con il medesimo. Qui non lo avevo infatti |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
