What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 254000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 27, 2012 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wanted to post the photo, to have constructive comments, as I would try to shoot subjects in flight and non-static (I have too many).
Thanks in advance to those who will give me a hand to improve. Ho voluto postare la foto, per avere dei commenti costruttivi, in quanto vorrei cercare di riprendere soggetti in volo e non statici ( ne ho fin troppi).
Grazie in anticipo a coloro che mi daranno un mano per migliorare. |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (13:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great photo, the subject well frozen, the shaded part is quite clear, the composition is pleasant, detail and mind,
for me is very good. ottima foto, soggetto ben congelato,la parte in ombra è ben leggibile, la compo è gradevole, il dettaglio e ben presente,
x me è ottima. |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (14:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, if you allow me a joke I would say that the selective noise reduction is evident ;-)
Since I know very well the subject and his "voletti" from the branch to the trunk I would advise you, next time, to remain well on t = 1/1250, do not overdo it with the iso (usually, if there is light enough ISO 800 and ev -0.7).
Hello
Alessandro Ciao, se mi permetti una battuta direi che la riduzione rumore selettiva è evidente 
Dato che conosco molto bene il soggetto e i suoi "voletti" dal ramo al tronco mi permetto di consigliarti, la prossima volta, di restare pure su t=1/1250, senza esagerare con gli iso (normalmente, se c'è luce, bastano iso 800 e ev -0.7).
Ciao
Alessandro |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A little else is noise, but beautiful anyway Un po di rumore cè, ma e bella lo stesso |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as alemat73 come alemat73 |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There is actually too much noise on the subject, the detail suffers. can solve at least in part in pp. just try something moving. ;-) si effettivamente c'è troppo rumore sul soggetto,il dettaglio ne risente. puoi risolvere almeno in parte in pp . giusto provare qualcosa in movimento. |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (18:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice the colors in the background and composition. The digital noise and chromatic find them excessive to such an extent as to undermine the detail / sharpness of the subject.
I think you could get a different result if you accontentavi of time and 800iso slower but still good enough to freeze the subject ;-).
hello and good light, laurel
Piacevoli le cromie sullo sfondo e la composizione. Il rumore digitale e cromatico li trovo eccessivi a tal punto da minare il dettaglio/la nitidezza del soggetto.
Penso che potevi avere un altro risultato se ti accontentavi di 800iso e di un tempo meno rapido ma comunque sufficiente per congelare il soggetto.
ciao e buona luce, lauro
|
| sent on February 27, 2012 (20:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful compo, I see very noisy especially on the subject hello ilario Bella la compo, la vedo molto rumorosa specialmente sul soggetto ciao ilario |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto above Quoto sopra |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks all for the passage and welcome comments, answer in general:
being the first time that I attempt in dynamic shots, in this case I opted for a rate 'of at least 1/2000, in this specific solution I had to take at 1600 ISO, but the subject has suffered a lot in the coming days to see post other photos taken with iso but more 'low, so that you can see the difference.
Hello to all. Grazie tutti per il passaggio e i graditi commenti; rispondo in generale:
essendo le prime volte che mi cimento in scatti dinamici, in questo caso ho optato per una velocita' di almeno 1/2000 , in questa specifica soluzione ho dovuto portare a 1600 iso, ma il soggetto ne ha risentito parecchio, nei prossimi giorni vedo di postare altri scatti fatti ma con iso piu' bassi, in modo tale da poter notare la differenza.
Ciao a tutti. |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The picture and 'excellent, unfortunately if there is no light, rather than move is a bit noisy ... better
The road you took me seems right
Greetings! ;-) La foto e' ottima,purtroppo se non c'è luce,piuttosto che mossa è meglio un pò rumorosa...
La strada che hai intrapreso mi sembra giusta 
Saluti! |
| sent on February 27, 2012 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gianluca for the passage and comment.
Hello. Grazie Gianluca per il passaggio e il commento.
Ciao. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
