JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 28, 2012 (9:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The ice has some very interesting designs but you have absolutely enhanced by focusing on the first floor, another of no interest. Personally I would close the frame excluding the first floor and looking for an image "abstract", I also closed the aperture for more depth of field Il ghiaccio ha dei disegni molto interessanti che però non hai assolutamente valorizzato mettendo a fuoco il primo piano, per altro di nessun interesse. Personalmente avrei stretto l'inquadratura escludendo il primo piano e cercando un'immagine "astratta", inoltre avrei chiuso il diaframma per avere più profondità di campo
sent on February 28, 2012 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Prisma for their helpful advice. I would also have a comment on the photo "Ice 3" you can see in the gallery Ice. Maybe meets the requirements that you have placed. Grazie Prisma per gli utili consigli. Vorrei avere un commento anche sulla foto "Ghiaccio 3" che puoi vedere nella galleria Ghiaccio. Magari soddisfa i requisiti che hai posto.
sent on February 28, 2012 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems to me that the problem is the same. To make you understand what I mean take a cut of your photo that goes from the top to the right until a little more than half of the sides. The result will be poor now because you cut a blur but instead Imagine it is sharp and who knows, maybe converted into a B / W high-contrast. Would get just an image with absolutely abstract drawings Mi sembra che il problema sia lo stesso. Per farti capire cosa intendo fai un ritaglio della tua foto che vada dall'angolo in alto a destra fino poco oltre la metà dei lati. Il risultato adesso sarà scadente perchè hai ritagliato un'immagine sfocata ma immaginala invece ben nitida e chissà, magari convertita in un b/n molto contrastato. Otterresti appunto un'immagine con dei disegni assolutamente astratti
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
