What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 24, 2014 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella. Where Have you taken? Bella. Dove L'hai scattata? |
| sent on October 24, 2014 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice! very beautiful colors! ;-) molto bella ! molto belli i colori ! |
| sent on October 24, 2014 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice compliments. bella complimenti. |
| sent on October 25, 2014 (7:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for the visit and the comment, the place is called Grottini since ancient times there were caves dug on the sea even used by the Etruscans as warehouses near the port of Phyrgi where now stands the Castle of Santa Severa at about 40 km from Rome Aurelia.
A greeting
Flavio Vi ringrazio per la visita ed il commento,il luogo si chiama Grottini in quanto anticamente c'erano delle grotte scavate proprio sul mare usate addirittura dagli etruschi come magazzini del vicino porto di Phyrgi dove ora sorge il Castello di Santa Severa a 40 km circa da Roma sull'Aurelia.
Un saluto
Flavio |
| sent on September 25, 2016 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. I was considering buying an ultra wide Sigma. I was torn between 8/16 and 10/20 3.5
Aside from the difference in euros, I read on this site, which unworthily recently I am part, that the 8/16 is crystal clear than the other, that is, the 3.5 and that you used you. seeing your photographs I would say it is a good goal, I'd be curious to know what is the main difference from 3.5. Molto bella. stavo valutando l'acquisto di un ultra wide Sigma. Ero indeciso tra 8/16 e il 10/20 3.5
A parte la differenza in euri, ho letto proprio su questo sito, cui indegnamente da poco ne faccio parte, che l'8/16 è nitidissimo rispetto agli altri, cioè il 3.5 e questo che hai usato tu. vedendo le tue foto direi che è un buon obiettivo, sarei curioso di sapere quale è la sostanziale differenza dal 3.5. |
| sent on September 25, 2016 (17:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Actually I used the Sigma 10-20 5.6 f4,5-
I do not know the 8-16 so I can not say anything, but between the two versions of the sigma 10-20 I can say that it is hard to find substantial differences if the difference in the diameter of the flower-thread (77 and 82 on the 3.5-5.6 3.5 ).
A greeting
Flavio Veramente io ho usato il sigma 10-20 f4,5- 5,6
non conosco l'8-16 quindi non posso dire nulla,ma tra le due versioni del sigma 10-20 posso dire che è difficile trovare differenze sostanziali se non la differenza del diametro della filettatura portafiori (77 il 3.5-5.6 e 82 il 3.5).
un saluto
Flavio |
| sent on September 26, 2016 (8:46) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Flavio. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
