What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 21, 2014 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
are you sure you shoot at f / 1.4 this f / 1.6 the other with a lens with maximum aperture of f / 3.5? in part this is usually the landscapes taking with apertures f / f 8/11 to get shallow depth of field and the lights form the star that gives less discomfort of the direct beam do not worry in the night to take pictures 4/8/10 seconds as long as they do not pull too much wind, the machine is placed on a tripod and use the remote control or lack the self-timer delay to two seconds that you should not have to move the car . My criticisms are not, are the basics that help you understand photography. probably taking in program are wrong unless you want to put photo but the satisfaction of having a picture studied in exposure time, aperture, ISO, color temperature !!! Sorry if it seemed like a sermon, they were just a lot of talk among amateur photographers.Hello Honorius sei sicuro di aver scattato a f/1.4 questa e f/1.6 l'altra con un obbiettivo con apertura massima f/3.5 ? a parte questo di solito i paesaggi si scattano con diaframmi chiusi f/8 f/11 per avere profondità di campo e le luci formano la stella che dà meno fastidio del fascio diretto non ti preoccupare nei notturni di fotografare con 4/8/10 secondi a patto che non tiri troppo vento la macchina sia ben piazzata su cavalletto e usi il telecomando o in mancanza l'autoscatto ritardato a due secondi che dovresti avere per non muovere la macchina. Le mie non sono critiche, sono nozioni di base che ti aiutano a capire la fotografia. probabilmente scattando in program si sbagliano meno foto ma vuoi mettere la soddisfazione di avere una foto studiata nei tempi, diaframmi, iso, temperatura colore !!!Scusa se è sembrata una predica, erano solo due chiacchiere fra fotografi molto dilettanti. Ciao Onorio |
| sent on October 21, 2014 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're not very amateur, on the other hand are definitely very prepared, at least the basic know them. E 'likely that the data that I have provided are not the right ones, I took after fumbling between times and apertures, also had a tripod with one foot and the photos are a bit' moves, not sharp. I will purchase immediately a tripod with 3 feet. Thanks again for the welcome advice, Hello .... Veris Tu non sei molto dilettante, al contrario sei sicuramente molto preparato, almeno i fondamentali li conosci. E' probabile che i dati che ho inserito non siano quelli giusti, ho scattato dopo aver armeggiato tra tempi e aperture del diaframma, inoltre avevo un treppiede con un piede solo e le foto sono un po' mosse, poco nitide. Acquisterò subito un treppiede con 3 piedi. Ti ringrazio ancora per i graditi consigli, Ciao....Veris |
| sent on March 17, 2015 (22:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shooting masterful Ripresa magistrale |
| sent on March 18, 2015 (8:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks again !!! Hello, Veris:-P Ancora grazie !!! Ciao, Veris |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |