What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user39791 | sent on October 15, 2014 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice! Bellissima! |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Filiberto;-) Grazie Filiberto  |
user21096 | sent on October 15, 2014 (16:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very well taken care of in composition (the beautiful diagionale arms - then that eye;-)) and also post production.
Compliments. Molto ben curata in composizione (bella la diagionale delle braccia - quell'occhio poi ) e pure post produzione.
Complimenti. |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Very well taken care of in composition (the beautiful diagionale arms - then that eye;-)) and also post production.
Compliments. „
Thanks Alex;-) " Molto ben curata in composizione (bella la diagionale delle braccia - quell'occhio poi ;-) ) e pure post produzione.
Complimenti. "
Grazie Alex |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (17:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice Molto bella |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (17:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gianni Grazie Gianni |
| sent on October 15, 2014 (20:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very special, beautiful !!! ;-) Molto particolare, bella!!! |
| sent on October 16, 2014 (0:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A portrait original and very interesting, a demonstration that going against the rules, but with very good taste, you will get the best results. Compliments. Un ritratto originale e molto interessante, una dimostrazione che andando contro le regole, ma con molto buon gusto, si ottengono i risultati migliori. Complimenti. |
| sent on October 16, 2014 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ A portrait original and very interesting, a demonstration that going against the rules, but with very good taste, you will get the best results. Compliments. „
thanks for the comment you left auspicious, very interesting and great for a discussion. How would you have gotten the same photo following the rules? I agree that with good taste will get the best results ... the problem is it on every photo ...:-D:-D:-D " Un ritratto originale e molto interessante, una dimostrazione che andando contro le regole, ma con molto buon gusto, si ottengono i risultati migliori. Complimenti. "
grazie del commento che hai lasciato fausto, molto interessante e ottimo per una discussione. Come avresti ottenuto la stessa foto seguendo le regole? Sono d'accordo che con il buon gusto si ottengono i migliori risultati...il problema è averlo su ogni foto... |
user21096 | sent on October 16, 2014 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am very curious as well. 8-)
Better than that I would not know how to compose.
The look and my eye catches the eye first:-D (sorry for the paraphrase) also accompanied (if it were needed) to the elbow and arm.
The forearm causes me a nice clean diagonal with the other arm that comes out of the scene but making the journey back always brings me back to the eye.
There is also the essential and well cared for, I really do not know how else, so I'm curious. Sono molto curioso pure io. 
Meglio di così non saprei proprio come comporla.
La osservo ed il primo occhio mi balza all'occhio (scusate il parafrasare) pure accompagnato (qualora ci fosse bisogno) da gomito e braccio.
L'avambraccio mi crea una bella diagonale pulita con l'altro braccio che esce dalla scena ma che facendo il percorso a ritroso mi riconduce sempre all'occhio.
C'è l'essenziale e pure ben curato, davvero non saprei in che altro modo, per questo sono curioso. |
| sent on October 16, 2014 (11:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Surely a basic rule is that the eye follows the direction of the head ... but in this case he would have lost the air of power and conquest by the look of the girl ... showing the whole arm would have had the same impact as the photo ? or would only have distracted? Sicuramente una regola base è che l'occhio segua la direzione della testa...ma in questo caso avrebbe perso l'aria di potere e conquista che da lo sguardo della ragazza...mostrando tutto il braccio avrebbe avuto lo stesso impatto la foto? o avrebbe solo distratto? |
user21096 | sent on October 16, 2014 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ showing the whole arm would have had the same impact as the photo? or would only have distracted? „
in my humble opinion the second. Would get too much "importance" since the shooting angle.
" mostrando tutto il braccio avrebbe avuto lo stesso impatto la foto? o avrebbe solo distratto? "
secondo il mio modesto parere la seconda. Avrebbe ottenuto troppa "importanza" visto l'angolo di scatto.
|
| sent on October 16, 2014 (11:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Also according to me, so I decided to make the cut (without considering that I am a lover of the cuts:-D:-D) Anche secondo me, per questo ho deciso di fare il taglio (senza considerare che sono un amante dei tagli ) |
user21096 | sent on October 16, 2014 (14:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, otherwise you were a hairdresser:-D:-D Beh, altrimenti facevi il parrucchiere |
| sent on October 16, 2014 (14:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-):-):-) That's right! ! :-) :-) :-) giusto! ! |
| sent on October 16, 2014 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry Sue, I read your answer just now. To "go against the rules" usually mean that you should not use a wide-angle focal length for portraits, the 'increase in the proportion of the head relative to the rest of the body due to the focal length and' visible, but in this case the result is' creative and not penalizing el 'eye, beautiful, becomes even more important. An 'other rule in the portraits suggest never to get out of the nose by the contour of the face as it has the perception of a longer nose of the real. In this case the arm and the hair positioned immediately behind attenuate the 'effect and make it more dynamic l' image. My comment was just a compliment to your ability and good taste. Scusa michele, ho letto solo adesso la tua risposta. Per "andare contro le regole" intendevo che solitamente si consiglia di non usare una focale grandangolare nei ritratti, l' aumento di proporzione della testa rispetto al resto del corpo dovuto alla focale e' visibile, ma in questo caso il risultato e' creativo e non penalizzante e l' occhio , bellissimo, diventa ancora più importante. Un' altra regola nei ritratti suggerisce di non fare mai uscire il naso dal contorno del volto in quanto si ha la percezione di un naso più lungo del reale. In questo caso il braccio e i capelli posizionati subito dietro attenuano l' effetto e rendono più dinamica l' immagine. Il mio commento era solo un complimento alla tua capacità e buon gusto. |
| sent on October 17, 2014 (10:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fausto I know that your comment was a compliment, my answer was in fact not a criticism, to my question, "How would you do this photo following the rules" was not to jump a challenge but a good question to open a discussion on the difference between the same photo taken with and without the standard rules ... basically discuss technique and a comparison is also used to get better (certainly in my case:-D)
For example, the nose coming out of the face so that it is not nice but I did not know that was a rule ...:-) for this composition I put his arm behind.
Regarding the wide angle ... is not the 50mm on FF that approaches the human eye? In this case I took a 30mm on aps ... Lo so Fausto che il tuo commento era un complimento, la mia risposta infatti non era una critica, alla mia domanda "come faresti questa foto seguendo le regole" non era per lanciarti una sfida ma solo una buona domanda per aprire una discussione sulla differenza tra la stessa foto fatta con e senza le regole standard...in fondo discutere di tecnica e mettersi a confronto serve anche per migliorarsi (di sicuro nel mio caso )
Per esempio il naso che esce dal viso so che non è bello ma non sapevo che fosse una regola... :-) per questo nella composizione gli ho messo il braccio dietro.
Per quanto riguarda il grandangolo...non è il 50mm su FF che si avvicina all'occhio umano? In questo caso ho scattato a 30mm su aps... |
user59947 | sent on April 12, 2017 (19:14) | This comment has been translated
 |
| sent on April 13, 2017 (10:51) | This comment has been translated
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
