What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 12, 2014 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Luh let it be the TC, use it smoothly and you'll see that with a little 'practice'll pull out of things significantly better. Luh lascia stare il TC, usalo liscio e vedrai che con un po' di pratica tirerai fuori delle cose sensibilmente migliori. |
| sent on October 12, 2014 (15:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the conditions in which the AF works I guess I first focus manually ... One of these days we try again with catadioptric smooth Nelle condizioni in cui lavora l'AF mi sa che faccio prima a mettere a fuoco manualmente ... Uno di questi giorni ci riprovo col catadiottrico liscio |
| sent on October 13, 2014 (1:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
anyway tell me what 's wrong ... and' in focus, and not 'was post-produced, and' was only slightly cropped and resized to 1200px, and frankly I do not understand where you could pull off more ' detail ... well partially transparent feathers are just so ', not' effect ... comunque dimmi cosa c'e' che non va ... e' a fuoco, non e' stata post-prodotta, e' stata solo leggermente ritagliata e ridimensionata a 1200px, e in tutta franchezza non capisco dove si potrebbe tirare fuori piu' dettaglio ... pure le piume parzialmente trasparenti sono proprio cosi', non e' un effetto ... |
| sent on October 14, 2014 (12:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Luh, is that with the multiplier you lose one stop of light, then you need to have a good yield close to a stop and this forces you to use those feelings, losing much detail. And anyway, with 1/800 to 840mm you are strong risk moved on moving subjects. Luh, è che con il moltiplicatore perdi uno stop di luminosità, poi per avere una buona resa devi chiudere di uno stop e questo ti obbliga ad usare quelle sensibilità, perdendo tanto dettaglio. E comunque con 1/800 a 840mm sei a fortissimo rischio mosso, su soggetti in movimento. |
| sent on October 14, 2014 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok now I understand :) but keep 'in mind that you can not tamarro to crop more' every now and then there 'to assess how well and how much you lose with the multiplier croppando without, and it was precisely this spirit of these tests. Fitting iso between 3200 and 1600, the difference objectively there 'but also that the cancel when Croppi 1600 iso. For the times ... well I bet the sky af / 11 total, iso 3200, overexposed by one stop and taking the 1/800 resulting for all that flying :) I did not have much choice ... but the end result and 'that the kenko is digested poorly, AF painful, might as well put on 1000 f / 10 catadioptric and focus manually, or find another multiplier that suit you best (of course if kenko did update the firmware ...)
Ok adesso ho capito :) tieni pero' presente che il tamarro non lo puoi croppare piu' di tanto, quindi c'e' da valutare bene quanto perdi col moltiplicatore e quanto croppando senza, ed era appunto questo lo spirito di queste prove. Lato iso tra 3200 e 1600 la differenza oggettivamente c'e' ma anche quella la annulli nel momento in cui croppi 1600 iso. Per i tempi ... beh ho puntato il cielo a f/11 totali, 3200 iso, sovraesposto di uno stop e tenuto l'1/800 risultante per tutto quello che volava :) non ho avuto molta scelta ... comunque il risultato finale e' che il kenko viene digerito male, AF penoso, tanto vale mettere su il 1000 f/10 catadiottrico e focheggiare manualmente, oppure trovare un altro moltiplicatore che ci si adatti meglio (certo che se kenko facesse aggiornare il firmware ...)
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
