What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 03, 2014 (8:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would correct the too obvious distortion. Io avrei corretto la fin troppo evidente distorsione. |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (10:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and suggestions. The "falling lines" I "dislike" for years: When the "correct" in PP, something always goes "wrong":-D and it is normal here ... maybe it's overkill, but I do not like then "stiracchiarle," the lines. I am of the opinion that putting everything in "lead", the "convergent" doest strongly "diverge" ... and this is not acceptable (imho). Even the eye perceives that the summit of any architectural structure ... "converge";-) - Greetings, G.Piero Grazie del passaggio e dei suggerimenti. Le "linee cadenti" mi sono "antipatiche" da sempre: Quando le "correggi" in P.P., qualcosa va sempre "storto"  ed è normale... qui magari è eccessivo, ma non amo poi "stiracchiarle", le linee. Sono dell'opinione che mettendo tutto a "piombo", le "convergenti" le fai fortemente "divergere"... e questo non è accettabile (imho). Persino l'occhio percepisce che il vertice di qualsiasi struttura architettonica... "converge" - Un saluto, G.Piero |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was referring to the distortion of the lens and not the falling lines (as in the other picture that I commented).
To understand ... look at the joints of the first row of tiles: it should be a straight line, but it's a bit 'arched. Mi riferivo alla distorsione ottica dell'obiettivo e non alle linee cadenti (come nell'altra foto che ho commentato).
Per capirci... guarda le fughe della prima riga di piastrelle: dovrebbe essere un linea retta, invece è un po' arcuata. |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (10:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 'a trifle that the tiles:-D trust me, I am referring to flashy Right Left distortion of the arches on the "sky", yes that does not go so well and in part is due to the forced "plumb", entirely . You could adjust, but I do not want:-D this time it's okay, G.Piero E' un'inezia quella delle piastrelle fidati, io mi riferisco alla distorsione vistosa Dx Sx degli archi sul "cielo", questo sì che non va tanto bene e in parte è dovuto alla forzata "messa a piombo", del tutto. Si potrebbe aggiustare, ma non ne ho voglia per questa volta va bene così, G.Piero |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
