What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 28, 2014 (14:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Can not miss that quality from a brand like this:-) and indeed from under the white of the subject emerges, hello gandy Impossibile che manchi qualità da un marchio così ed infatti da sotto il bianco del soggetto emerge, ciao gandy |
| sent on September 28, 2014 (14:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is in fact my concerns are mm. and not for the quality. :-)
Thank you for picking me up. ;-) Si infatti la mia perplessità sono i mm. e non per la qualità. Grazie per il passaggio. |
| sent on October 02, 2014 (21:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Taking quality and goodness' lens you see the whole course and maneuver a 50 'else a 180 certain that the blurred and' very different as the dist mf I have the sigma 150 and 50 f2 zuiko macro them Use both with grade satisfaction depends on the subject that I am, however, represent 'the 50 is in a bit more' difficult to manage.
piero Scatto di qualita e la bonta' dell'ottica si vede tutta certo manovrare un 50 e' altra cosa di un 180 certo che lo sfocato e' ben diverso come la dist di mf io ho il 150 sigma e il 50 f2 zuiko macro e li uso entrambi con grade soddisfazione dipende dai soggetti che devo rappresentare trovo pero' che il 50 sia un pelino piu' difficile da gestire. piero |
| sent on October 02, 2014 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great detail branded Zeiss, a little disturbing 'the focus of the roost in the foreground, but are personal impressions.
Greetings ale Gran dettaglio marchiato Zeiss, disturba un po' lo sfuocato del posatoio in primo piano, ma sono impressioni personali. Saluti ale |
| sent on October 02, 2014 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Olpi, you're absolutely right I find it especially difficult for parallelism, for the background I like that they are a bit lively. The choice of the Zeiss is mainly due to its lightness, it made no sense for me to keep the 180 with A6000, surely there were also lighter alternative to optical adapter, however, thought that this is the lightest solution.
Ale Thanks for your comment, surely the roost is very cumbersome. ;-) Olpi, hai perfettamente ragione soprattutto trovo difficoltà per il parallelismo, per lo sfondo mi piacciono che siano un pochino movimentati. La scelta dello Zeiss è soprattutto per la sua leggerezza, per me non aveva senso tenere il 180 con A6000, sicuramente c'erano anche alternative di ottiche più leggere con adattatore, però pensò che questa sia la soluzione più leggera. Grazie Ale del tuo commento, sicuramente il posatoio è molto ingombrante. |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (8:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Max, In this post I understood your last 'cause you changed the system. Knowing your skills for a long time, I did not understand why 'taking steps backwards with the' equipment. If because of health / back pain you have all my support! Here, however, we can appreciate the sharpness of your new glass! Then if you like having more motion backgrounds with 'no choice is perfect. On the roost share the thought of Ale. Hello;-) Ciao Max, In questo tuo post ho capito finalmente perche' hai cambiato sistema. Conoscendo da tempo la tua bravura, non capivo perche' fare passi in dietro con l' attrezzatura. Se per via della salute/mal di schiena hai tutto il mio appoggio! Qui comunque si apprezza la nitidezza del tuo nuovo vetro!Se poi ti piace avere movimento con sfondi piu' presenti la scelta è perfetta. Sul posatoio condivido il pensiero di Ale. Ciao |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (8:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The optics is as valid as the rest of the photographer, everything will depend on the results obtained do not regret the good old 180're on track to do well. L'ottica è valida come del resto il fotografo, tutto dipenderà dai risultati ottenuti il non rimpiangere il caro buon vecchio 180. Sei sulla buona strada per far bene. |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks silo and pigi of encouragement. :-) Grazie silo e pigi del l'incoraggiamento. |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (22:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the photo is beautiful, no doubt with a 50 mm are less fatigue, I just think we need a little confidence to take then the pictures will be beautiful :)
hello Marco la foto è stupenda, sicuramente con un 50 mm si fatica di meno, penso solo che serva un pochino per prenderci confidenza poi le fotografie saranno bellissime :) ciao Marco |
| sent on October 03, 2014 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the nice comment va.mark. ;-) Grazie del bel commento va.mark. |
user59947 | sent on August 30, 2016 (19:21) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (12:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Where did you buy Plamp? Dove hai acquistato il Plamp? |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (12:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
self-built, about 5-6 years ago ... autocostruito, circa 5-6 anni fa... |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As? Come? |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |