What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 10, 2014 (13:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. It seems overexposed. Missing the parallelism and the pdf that made you blur the wings. f5 I know that is little.
Opinion of an ass trying with little success to make macro. We insist. Hello. Ciao. Mi sembra sovraesposta. Manca il parallelismo e la pdf che ti ha fatto sfocare le ali. f5 mi sa che è pochino.
Parere di un asino che tenta con scarsi risultati di fare macro. Insistiamo. Ciao. |
| sent on September 10, 2014 (13:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Francesco, you're absolutely right!
The macros are not at all my field (assuming there is one:-D) and it shows ...
F5 I chose it because I wanted to blur the background to the maximum, not finding it a bit 'chaotic, but actually it has also led to blur the edges of the wings; But at least the sharpness of the body satisfies me.
Thanks for the constructive criticism!
Mark Ciao Francesco, hai assolutamente ragione!
Le macro non sono per nulla il mio campo (ammesso che ce ne sia uno  ) e si vede...
Ho scelto f5 perchè volevo sfocare al massimo lo sfondo, non trovandolo un po' caotico, però effettivamente ciò ha portato anche a sfocare le estremità delle ali; però almeno la nitidezza del corpo mi soddisfa.
Grazie della critica costruttiva!
Marco |
| sent on September 10, 2014 (14:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, it's true! I must say that here it was about 10 a nice cool morning on the 900 meters high, then the butterfly was still pretty groggy and became closer with no problems. :-P Si, è vero! Devo dire che qui erano circa le 10 di una mattina bella fresca sui 900 metri di altezza, quindi la farfalla era ancora abbastanza intontita e si è fatta avvicinare senza problemi.  |
| sent on September 10, 2014 (15:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with the suggestions of Francis. Personally I prefer to have a background in this, but the subject is in focus.
Compositionally maybe you could a little space from the edge of the right wing. Concordo con i suggerimenti di Francesco. Personalmente preferisco avere uno sfondo presente, ma il soggetto a fuoco.
Compositivamente forse si poteva distanziare leggermente l'ala dx dal bordo. |
| sent on September 10, 2014 (16:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride Pigi, also for the advice on the composition.
I will treasure your advice for the next time when I shall have occasion to try my hand with the Macros.
Mark Grazie del passaggio Pigi, anche per il consiglio sulla composizione.
Farò tesoro dei vostri consigli per le prossime volte in cui avrò occasione di cimentarmi con le macro.
Marco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
